Planning
[PDF]Site Improvement Plan Leighton Moss - Natural England
publications.naturalengland.org.uk/.../47...
23 Oct 2014 - Leighton Moss SPA, situated adjacent to Morecambe Bay in the Arnside and Silverdale AONB, supports the largest reedbed in ... Reduce red deer numbers through a coordinated cull.
To make life easier for others, I take it you mean this?
It's a simple document that outlines the pressures on the area (there are a large number of similar documents covering important nature areas around the country). Deer are identified as one of those problems for Leighton Moss along with water pollution, silt, water levels etc. An estimate for the cost to deal with the various issues is given, but there's nothing in here to say when anything may happen, progress against the plans and so on. These aren't detailed execution plans, they're merely outlines of what should be done. I would assume the RSPB would take into account the information contained within the document, it identifies them as the lead party (presumably as the major landowner?) and even suggests them as a funding option. But it doesn't state any specifics. Perhaps there is more information available I haven't yet found?
___
Find me on Flickr / All about your camera - The Getting off Auto Index
Deer cull to help bitterns....really? Has the deer population really just become such a problem that they affect the bitterns? There seems such a lot of work going on at the reserve recently that maybe it's all being interfered with too much? is it really going to cost £20000?
If you really believe the RSPB should leave the ecosystem alone I look forward to your posts objecting to the sluices, reed cutting, dredging, grit trays, nest boxes, feeders, etc. The very existence of Leighton Moss as we see it today is due to a managed ecosystem.
Do the deer need culled? I don't know. I do know your argument against was ridiculous.
Thank you for your comments. Here's more information from our Site Manager to explain the situation:
RSPB Leighton Moss is situated in an area of outstanding natural beauty, enjoyed by thousands of people every year. The RSPB wants to continue to attract visitors to the area to ensure future generations are inspired by their natural surroundings. This can only be achieved if we manage the special habitats here for all wildlife, so that species such as bitterns, otters and marsh harriers can thrive.
As part of maintaining this wonderful landscape and managing valuable habitats such as the reedbed, it has become necessary to control the deer population at Leighton Moss. Red deer are a native species and are important to the site. However, the current deer population on and around Leighton Moss has increased steadily in recent years, resulting in excessive deer grazing pressure. This has caused significant damage to the important reedbed habitat, which is impacting on key species of birds and other wildlife.
In order to protect the iconic and internationally important reedbed at Leighton Moss, the RSPB needs to take action to reduce and then maintain the populations of deer. Leighton Moss is currently designated as Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI) and a Special Protection Area (SPA) and as such, we have a legal responsibility to improve and maintain the condition of these habitats.
We review the condition of the habitats on an annual basis and use this to determine our management actions. It was through this process over a number of years that we identified that the habitat condition at Leighton Moss was deteriorating due to deer browsing pressure. We are a science-led organisation and base our decisions on the best available evidence. Using a combination of data from habitat surveys, deer counts, aerial footage and fixed point photography, we have concluded that deer are having a significant negative impact on the reedbed.
Deer have no natural predators in the UK and with relatively mild winters, there is little mortality caused by the frost and snow. Therefore their population levels are not naturally kept in check. The deer population at Leighton Moss and the surrounding area has been steadily increasing since the early 1980s and has now reached a level which is not sustainable for the health of the reedbed and surrounding land. Deer management will help to address this and maintain the health of the reedbed ecosystem, enabling the red deer to thrive alongside a rich variety of important wildlife.
The decision to control deer has not been taken lightly and we are not alone in having to do this. Deer control is a legal and widely undertaken part of countryside management in Lancashire, Cumbria and elsewhere in the UK. We have a legal responsibility to maintain and improve the condition of the nationally important wildlife habitats at Leighton Moss, and the deer control will be carried out as part of a wider landscape scale deer management programme in the area. The RSPB is a science-based organisation and we considered all non-lethal alternatives before determining this was the only remaining option to restore the quality of the habitat.
Fencing is not a suitable option as we do not want to fence deer in or exclude all deer from the site, but maintain a sustainable population of red deer at Leighton Moss. By using fencing to exclude deer, the problem of deer grazing pressure would move elsewhere in the area. We could also not guarantee all deer would be removed from a fenced enclosure. Scaring is not a sustainable option and could potentially impact on other priority species using Leighton Moss.
Birth control is also not a viable option for use on a free-ranging wild population of deer, such as those in the Leighton Moss area. This would not address the need to reduce the current population of deer at Leighton Moss and hence not reduce the current damage to habitats on the reserve.
Red deer are one of the most popular species for visitors to see at Leighton Moss and that will remain the case following the deer management. We will maintain a population of red deer at Leighton Moss, providing enjoyment for visitors to watch them, whilst striking a balance to ensure we can also enhance the reserve’s important habitats. We take our responsibility to protect vulnerable habitats and wildlife very seriously and would not be undertaking this action if it would have a detrimental impact on local populations of wildlife.
We appreciate that everyone is entitled to their own opinion and to voice their concerns, but we hope this explains the need to take this course of action.
"Birth control is also not a viable option for use on a free-ranging wild population of deer, such as those in the Leighton Moss area. This would not address the need to reduce the current population of deer at Leighton Moss and hence not reduce the current damage to habitats on the reserve."....so this could have been an option had the problem been addressed earlier? ...and No I might not know as much as others contributing to this thread but as a life long member of the RSPB,visitor to this reserve for 45 years,financial supporter of this charity and being passionate for all wildlife I feel I should be able to ask questions and be given explanations.
Unknown said:so this could have been an option had the problem been addressed earlier?
Not how I read it. How practical would it be to round up a herd of deer on a regular basis to neuter some (but not all) or administer birth control drugs to some (but not all). I suppose you could administer drugs via food - but that's hardly a good idea, leaving powerful drugs lying on the ground for anything else to pick up. It would be far too haphazard.
There are only three effective ways I can see to control deer in this situation. Fence them in and farm them (which is hardly the point of having wild deer roaming the area), operate an occasional cull or introduce an apex predator. Whilst it might be interesting to have packs of wolves roaming the populated areas of the country, I suspect that it wouldn't be too practical!
The arrogance of an organisation that purports to care for wildlife. Killing red deer and interfering with nature. I will NEVER give a penny to the RSPB again and will encourage everyone I know to take the same approach. Disgrace.