Moderation of the Community

Good afternoon,

I thought I would update you all on some of the work we have been doing this week following the recent SPAM issues on the website.

As you know, due to a number of resource constraints here, we are not actively able to monitor the community on a daily basis, but rely on the regular visitors of the community, like yourselves, to alert us of any issues.

We know how important the community is to many of you and we love that you feel so passionately about it and want to maintain standards within it. To ensure we can address the moderation issues, we are currently speaking to all the colleagues who are moderators regarding their involvement in the community and we are also exploring other options to expand the resources of those who are able to moderate content in a more efficient way. Some of these solutions include "out of hours" and weekend support as we know the community is busy all day, every day.

While we work on these solutions, I thought I would reiterate the ideal way to report spam or abusive content on the community and to "flag" the concern to us. The best way to do this, if you are unsure, is in one of the following ways:

1. In the forum thread, next to any of the posts or replies there is a MORE option. Select this and then select the "Flag as spam/abuse" option (see example)

or

2. In a blog or news item select the "Flag as spam/abuse" option in the right-hand column (see example)

Now currently, spam or abusive content is not automatically removed if only one person complains about it; this is to ensure fairness within the community. But, if more than two contributors report it then there are automatic rules that will, in some cases, remove the content immediately.

These rules are based on a number of settings, which we are currently reviewing, but in basic terms, it is to do with the credibility and authority any user has within the community.

This credibility and authority is called a Value Score and is made up of many different things including; the number of posts, likes, time in the community, etc. If the combined Value Score of the people reporting the abuse is higher than the person who has posted the allegedly abusive or spam content, then the post will be automatically removed. If the combined score of the people reporting is lower then the content will remain until it has been reviewed by a moderator and this will follow our standard Moderation escalation process.

To help prevent spam and abusive content from appearing in the first place we have the following things already in place:

1. Registration security (reCaptcha) - which prevents automatic services from registering and posting. Unfortunately, the recent activity is not automated and is actually individuals creating accounts and posting spam content. We could put further measures in place to prevent new registrations from posting immediately, but we feel this would impact those legitimate new users from becoming active.

2. Content filters - we do have filters in place that prevent abusive language or content from being posted and we will continue to monitor these filters to ensure they are as robust as they can be.

We are also reviewing the SPAM filters, which are able to recognise a certain type of SPAM-like behaviour and prevent the post from publishing in the first place.

We hope this update gives you some confidence that, with the limited resources, we are doing all we can to ensure moderation happens as quickly as possible.

Many thanks for your support and understanding,

Elliott 

  • Was definitely a great thread to follow ... my opinion is that if this communitg forum were to be shut down, even if only temporarily, then current posters would find some other outlet to communicate & never return ... maybe a great deal of them give up on sharing views & pics altogether!
    Yes, it's a pain at times but we've muddled through the worst of it & come to know how to use facilities to best advantage ... it's not so bad that it requires such drastic actions as have been suggested IMO!

    Being able to share & keep in touch with others who have become friends & advisors over a long period is the main criteria surely!

     

     2013 photos & vids here

    eff37 on Flickr

  • What I’m mostly worried about is my security. I’m not very technical about this. But if there’s no other way and no one seems to like my proposal from earlier, then sadly I agree with Robbo on this occasion and sadly a short suspension of this forum maybe should happen, unless the moderators can suggest something really good for safety on this forum and also for security reasons, that I really do worry about.

    Regards,

    Ian.

  • Then there’s also the risk at this time of some legitimate posts being flagged as spam by at least one person, could be more working together to cause mischief and problems for all the members who are here for there love and wildlife. But at the moment there is just no pleasure in posting at the moment on this forum and I think a little inconvenience for all of us for period of time until the moderation of this forum is sorted out. I have heard from some of my RSPB Birdwatching friends about the problems the RSPB are having with certain things at this present time.

    Regards,

    Ian.

  • Sound reasoning D, can't see this site poses any more of a security risk than any other ... if anything it would be Facebook & general emails that I would be more concerned about but isn't that what all these anti-malware etc providers are about whether paid or free!

     

     2013 photos & vids here

    eff37 on Flickr

  • I was going to ask/suggest that if a certain number of flags had been raised, then the post would automatically be removed, so it's good to read that is in place.

  • I was going to ask/suggest that if a certain number of flags had been raised, then the post would automatically be removed, so it's good to read that is in place.
  • SunnyKate2 said:

    Sorry to duplicate... Kept getting page error for this thread , when clicking last post doh! so I replied on the other thread.
    Thanks Elliott
    I note you say that " automation of SPAM removal will do what is supposed to do "

    Is that what worked on the latest SPAM? or did you or someone manually remove?

    Surely your mentioning "no one available over weekend," would therefore .be benefical if one of our Members was given authority to remove any offenders.

    Still good to read your comments. Thank you

    EDIT and just received this in response to this posting Doh! and yet it has posted......

    Same here, just!

  • Anither of those niggles that need sorting but thankful that it's only this thread that seems to affected!

     

     2013 photos & vids here

    eff37 on Flickr

  • Richard99 said:
    Hi Elliott

    Like Fulgrim above, I have also just been flagged as spam and have been threatened with removal from the community. I do not believe I have done anything wrong but please let me know if you disagree.

    The RSPB will not have a flourishing forum if it drives away genuine users.

    Would that be spammers trying to bite back?

  • Fulgrim said:
    It appears I spoke to soon, both the above reply from me and my account were both reported again.

    It might be spammers fighting back, and it seems you've been chosen as a target, possibly with others to follow.

    its a shame that some mindless morons have to spoil something that trundles along nicely. Hang in there good will win.