This quite biased artlcle in The Daily Mail is a must read for any BOP enthusiast.Scaremonger tatics at their worst and reading some of the comments they are actually convincing people that this is a bad plan - they are going to be persecuted
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1277937/RSPB-accused-obsession-saving-birds-prey-Country-Life-rural-bible.html
Of all creatures, man is the most detestable, he is the only creature that inflicts pain for sport, knowing it to be pain. ~ Mark Twain
I read the article this morning JudiM. It is one more article to add to the hysteria that the release of the Sea Eagles in East Anglia is suffering. I now wonder if they should go ahead with this plan, as there seems to be so much anti publicity being aired and written, with very incorrect information, that the poor eagles don't stand a chance before they are even released.
I totally agree with you Brenda they stand no chance with this irresponsible type of journalism.
There will always be articles like this, especially in the Daily Mail, best thing to do is avoid it like the plague! They attitudes (and not just towards wildlife) are sickening to the extreme.
Millie & Fly the Border Collies
Usual Daily Wail guff and no surprise that the elitist Country Life is spouting complete garbage as usual.
As it happens I've discussed the Sparrowhawk issue with Christopher Bell over on Birdforum and while he seems to be a touch blinkered about the role of changed agricultural practice in sparrow decline he readily accepts that lowered House Sparrow numbers are probably associated with a population adjustment following a long period of Sparrowhawk absence during which sparrows lost their aerial predator averse behaviour. If you like - they just got too cocky.
Now that a natural predator is back in its rightful place House Sparrows are back to "normal" numbers (they used to be regarded as pests during the sixties when they were super abundant as some of you will remember). They may also be a bit less in your face as they have reacquired basic survival skills. Dr Bell also pointed out that House Sparrow numbers appear to be recovering in London and other areas.
I'll say this one more time. Hawks and Falcons do not decimate songbird populations. Does Country Life honestly believe that nature is that stupid.......?
Well you know the answer to that one anyway.
Every day a little more irate about bird of prey persecution, and I have a cat - Got a problem with that?
I am not so sure about your small birds being cocky as you say, where I live my house backs onto a chalkpit so I have a grand stand seat watching a group of 4 Sparrow hawks continuously killing small birds. At one time my garden was the host to many different varieties of small birds, but now, what with Magpies stealing eggs, and hawks hunting they are practically now non existant. The only birds I get in the garden now are large birds like blackbirds and wood pigeons. I know this is nature, and birds of prey need to hunt to survive, but I think that at the rate these four Hawks are killing, the area will soon be baren of all types of small birds.
The study only looked at House Sparrows. I wouldn't describe a Dunnock (for example) as cocky.
Sparrowhawks are specialist bird predators. Having them around suggests that there is a healthy food supply available for them. If this changes the Sparrowhawks will disappear. The vacant space will then soon be reoccupied by small birds moving in (and they breed far more prolifically than their predators). Eventually apex predators will arrive again and the cycle would repeat itself. This is what happens at local level as, overall, everything evens out. Sparrowhawks and other predators can have localised effects on prey populations but this is all part of having a healthy functioning ecosystem.
Most predatory birds are fiercely territorial. They will guard the airspace they need to hunt in from same species competitors. Only when prey is superabundant will they relax this rule. A small woodland with its several hundred breeding pairs of small birds may have one pair of resident Sparrowhawks. Your group of four was probably a family party and the kids will be kicked out soon enough.
Nature is good at the numbers game - It's had a long time to practice getting it right.
Hi John B (not the sloop)
Your comments are very well put and make a lot of sense.
Personally, I agree with what you say about predatory birds, but I know that there are some people who don't.
I'm surprised at Country Life for getting involved in this way.
Best wishes Chris
Click Here to see my photos
Unknown said: The study only looked at House Sparrows. I wouldn't describe a Dunnock (for example) as cocky. Sparrowhawks are specialist bird predators. Having them around suggests that there is a healthy food supply available for them. If this changes the Sparrowhawks will disappear. The vacant space will then soon be reoccupied by small birds moving in (and they breed far more prolifically than their predators). Eventually apex predators will arrive again and the cycle would repeat itself. This is what happens at local level as, overall, everything evens out. Sparrowhawks and other predators can have localised effects on prey populations but this is all part of having a healthy functioning ecosystem. Most predatory birds are fiercely territorial. They will guard the airspace they need to hunt in from same species competitors. Only when prey is superabundant will they relax this rule. A small woodland with its several hundred breeding pairs of small birds may have one pair of resident Sparrowhawks. Your group of four was probably a family party and the kids will be kicked out soon enough. Nature is good at the numbers game - It's had a long time to practice getting it right.
I would just like to congratulate you on being the voice of reason and putting across the facts so eloquently. I get far too angry in response to issues such as this and always stick my foot in my mouth so to have somebody who sees this matter from my point of view and to be able to put it forward so well makes me happy.
Hi Judi
Am I mistaken by hasn't the Sea Eagle in Norfolk project been stopped already ?
My simple answer to all these people nature is all about balance. It's only man that screws it up.
In the case of the Sea Eagle this is a rather special BOP. Even if it can be proved that these birds take lambs is that not a small price to pay for what we have done to them....
Robert
Hi Robert
The Sea Eagle project is stalled because Natural England, a major funding partner, is, like all public sector bodies, having its budget hammered and can no longer afford to assist. Most of the local opposition to the release proposal came from free range pig and poultry interests. Outside the agricultural sector opinions were more positive.
JBNTS