The team are off to The Gambia on 7/1/2014 and Tim's latest Blog gives all the details. Watch this space.
Birdies LG DU update.
Thanks for all that info TIGER I remember reading about 09(98) helping out but hadn't equated it with 28(10) Gooh ol@ 09...sorely missed
Fantastic chart CHOC I have put itin my favourites Well done you!
Both on the nest together...just chilling out....literally I think given the wind
Ooooh, just logged onto this site, such a lot of confusing happenings & facts since last night!! My brain hurts & CB has best idea! Lol
Much rereading & studying of Chx chart called for methinks!
One of 9 (98) chicks is Blue OJ. Can you imagine an osprey called OJ ?
Tiger Signature
God forbid. If he/she comes back better call them Jo
This is a period this morning showing the developing relationship between Mrs5R and Blue28(10)... I've never seen an osprey defend herself like this, she lies completely flat over the nestcup, her tail fanned and flattened, no-one could possibly access the crucial area to mate. However, the descent of Blue28 changed her mind in an instant - did she have a choice or did her hormones rule?
IMAGICAT
chocoholix said: Do we know what male is on Nest K? I can't work it out :-(06(09) I think Karen though I am sure someone will put me right if I am wrong :) [/quote] It was 08(01), but then he didn't come back last year. 30(05) pair bonded with 06(09) but they didn't breed. I don't think we know whether 06 is back? Rutland have said all last year's breeding males are back - so it isn't very clear at the moment. No doubt we will find out at some point when they update on what's happening with 30(05), given all the interest in her now. [/quote]When 00(09) arrived back in March Rutland initially tweeted the she was a successful breeding female from last year. They quickly changed that to say she had pair bonded with 06(09) but hadn't bred. Has any info been released to say 06(09) had bonded with 30(05) or are we just putting 2 & 2 together?
Do we know what male is on Nest K? I can't work it out :-(
[/quote]
It was 08(01), but then he didn't come back last year. 30(05) pair bonded with 06(09) but they didn't breed.
I don't think we know whether 06 is back? Rutland have said all last year's breeding males are back - so it isn't very clear at the moment. No doubt we will find out at some point when they update on what's happening with 30(05), given all the interest in her now.
[/quote]When 00(09) arrived back in March Rutland initially tweeted the she was a successful breeding female from last year. They quickly changed that to say she had pair bonded with 06(09) but hadn't bred. Has any info been released to say 06(09) had bonded with 30(05) or are we just putting 2 & 2 together?
Short blog and fantastic pictures of yesterdays action
Thanks Patily. Fabulous photographs.