Any one got any thoughts on the RSPB’s central management decision to categorise all their woodland reserves as Category 4…Of no value to the RSPB strategy… and is mothballing (at best) or SELLING (at worst) despite the fact that woodland has, as a resource for nature, been identified as poorly managed nationally and, since the 1970s 70 to 80 percent of the birds living in woodland have been lost to us? A free thoughts come to mind for discussion: 1. RSPB management have forgotten what they are about, 2. Birding ids much more difficult, and therefore not as profitable as it is in Category 1 and 2 reserves… Wetland, Estuarine, Cliff
There are lots of RSPB RESERVES THAT ARE NOT PUBLISUSED.I know what they all are as I did find out llegslly’
Regards,
Ian.
https://opendata-rspb.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/6076715cb76d4c388fa38b87db7d9d24
Hi Thomo, I am not sure that you have read what I said in my post properly. I am talking about the behaviour of the RSPB management and what they are doing to the reserves.
You seem to have missed the point on what I have said Thomo
.