Can you ID this Bird, I have been asked what it is, unfortunately I don't have a clue. But its very Pretty.
It's been visiting a garden feeding station recently.
It looks like a dunnock with a white throat and wing! The pattern on the back definately makes me think dunnock plus the grey head.
Millie & Fly the Border Collies
hi Juno
The bird looks like a Dunnock with a few white feathers - albinoism does come to mind. The birds stance gives the species of bird away. Dunnocks have that hunched up look when they stand still.
It may be the fact it is a juvenile and that is why it looks a bit miscoloured.
Regards
Kathy and Dave
Juno said: Can you ID this Bird, I have been asked what it is, unfortunately I don't have a clue. But its very Pretty. It's been visiting a garden feeding station recently.
Hi,
yups it's a dunnock- a partial albino one .
S
For advice about Birding, Identification,field guides, binoculars, scopes, tripods, etc - put 'Birding Tips' into the search box
Thank You everyone, I wasn't quite sure. I'm still learning the Small brown jobs, then they throw up extra markings.
Aberrant plumages can be very confusing. If you see a bird with areas of white plumage that are asymmetrical, it will be a case of partial leucism (not partial albinism - that doesn't exist because albinism is an all-or-nothing thing). That's not to say that a partially leucistic bird can't have symmetrical white bits by chance...
Albinism, where the whole bird is white with pink/red eyes and depigmented bill and legs, is much rarer than full or partial leucism which only affects the melanin in the feathers, partly because albinism is often associated with severe eyesight defects making survival (even more) difficult.
My blog: http://mazzaswildside.blogspot.co.uk/
My Flickr page: https://www.flickr.com/photos/124028194@N04/
Hi Juno,
the bird in your photo is a Dunnock which has been correctly identified.
I would however refer to the bird as been a Leucastic bird rather than partial albino. There has been a lot of literature written on Leucism over the last few years, and it really depends on whom you are talking to as to what definition you will be given.
There is a difference of opinion and definition of Leucism and Albinism between, "ordinary birders" and scientists. In the scientific circles there seem to be little doubt that the term "albino" is only used if there is a complete lack of pigmentation, including soft parts.
Leucism describes the various forms where there is a lack of pigmentation, but not complete. Do note that this lack can be complete in areas and still be considered leucistic, as long as other areas do have pigmentation to some extent.
Hence, "partial albino" is not used at all.
This also concurs with the ideas taught in the biology in university.
Scientifically, a bird with white patches is, in fact, leucistic.
However, this is where "ordinary birders" differ, I think in part because the term leucistic only entered the scene fairly recently in these circles. Previously, when not knowing the term leucistic, it would be logical to use the wellknown albino in a modified way; i.e. "partial albino".
However, then "leucistic" enter the scene and the confusion appears to be total.
Albino refers only to things that have two recessive genes and, therefore, no pigment anywhere.
As leucism is a spectrum between white and normal, any odd white feathers are leucistic. This could be genetic, or indeed possibly from infection/trauma and diet may also contribute to abnormalities.
If you say 'albino' people think of a pure white bird with pink eyes (no pigment anywhere), and if you say 'leucistic' then most people think of a pale, washed out bird where the colouring is diluted.
If you say 'partial albino' then people know what you mean - a bird with white patches. As such, they cannot be 'partial albino' as they do not have both recessive genes.
Leucism
Leucism is kind of the opposite of melanism.
Regards Buzzard
Nature Is Amazing - Let Us Keep It That Way
Further to Buzzard's post, anyone who's interested in weird avian pigmentation stuff might want to take a look at this excellent paper (which is in English, not Dutch, and includes some very cool photos) - http://www.vogelringschier.nl/DB28%282%2979-89_2006.pdf
Hi aiki and Buzzard
Fantastic information, which I never knew about and it is now well explained by members like yourself, so there should be no more confusion about the correct terminology of names for certain things to do with white feathering, and markings with wild birds.
Your postings deserve to be 'sticky's' on this forum
A big thumbs up!!
I saw this today, is this Leucism.....?
My Blog!
My Flickr!
No wonder I have so much trouble..................
Robert