I've handed the reins of my blog over to Mark Avery for most of June. Mark's sharing the successes and challenges of saving nature around the world in the run up to the Rio+20 Earth Summit.

If you have had an eye on nature for the last few decades then you are likely to have noticed changes around you. The chiffchaffs that I used to hope to hear before my birthday at the end of March I now hear a couple of weeks earlier. Many butterflies are spreading north in the UK, for example marbled whites and speckled woods, even though in some cases their populations are declining in numbers.  My walks in rural Northamptonshire are now quite likely to include sightings of little egrets, which would have been very rare sightings even 20 years ago.

Observations reveal to us the biological impacts of a warming global and local climate; spring events nudge a little earlier and southern species spread north. 

Nature is on the move in space and time, across the world, because of climate change and we can see signs of those changes in the nature around us – and in the fact that you need to cut the grass later and later each autumn as the growing season lengthens.

There is already plenty of evidence that these climate-induced changes may not all be benign. Some summer migrants, unlike my chiffchaffs, have not shifted their arrival dates forward, we don’t really know why not. And, looking across Europe as a whole, those species, such as wood warblers, that have not advanced their arrival dates are declining rapidly. It may be, and the RSPB is looking at these issues, that somehow, some species are a bit stuck – they can’t get back to their breeding grounds any earlier and so when they do return they find that they are missing important flushes of insect life which are now happening a little earlier in the year.

And many species which are moving north are also losing ground on the southern edge of their range. Take the Dartford warbler as an example. This resident warbler has spread north in recent decades, and we expect to see that continue, but at the southern edge of its range in Europe, which holds many more Dartford warblers, the Spanish and Portuguese see declines in numbers. Will northern England, Ireland and Denmark really provide enough suitable habitat for Dartford warblers to compensate for the losses further south in their range? 

Northern species don’t have as much scope to move further north – if you keep pushing polar bears north then they end up all trying to live at the North Pole, and where do Orkney and Shetland’s whimbrels go – there’s a lot of sea and not much land north of them?

Species living on low-lying coasts, whether they be redshank on Essex saltmarshes or tigers in the Sunderban mangrove ecosystem will be threatened by rising sea levels. Species that live at high altitudes may find their habitats are squeezed out whether they be the already extinct golden toad of Costa Rica or the dotterel of our Scottish mountain tops.

Climate change throws challenges at all life on the planet – our species and all other species too. As many as a third of all species on Earth may be committed to extinction by climate change by the end of this century.Will we rise to the challenge and will this month’s Rio+20 summit help move things along enough? And should I feel pleased or sad when I hear an early chiffchaff?

The UK should be leading the move to a fair and green economy, not going backwards on its commitments. We are asking as many MPs as possible to sign the Stop Climate Chaos Coalition’s Rio Declaration to commit to a sustainable future. Step and ask your MP to support the Rio-UK Declaration.

Dr Mark Avery is a former Conservation Director of the RSPB and now is a writer on environmental matters. We’ve asked Mark to write these 20 essays on the run up to the Rio+20 conference.  His views are not necessarily those of the RSPB.  Mark writes a daily blog about UK nature conservation issues.

  • Mark -wish I could be optimistic that they will all agree to take action immediately.Seem to think that I saw somewhere that in the 39-45 war Spitfires were built in a day obviously because it was necessary,any chance this lot agreeing and taking action in one day,surely easier in theory than the building of a Spitfire.

    Cynical Sooty thinks many go there with no intention of reaching agreement and is there anyone who is not a Lib Dem who thinks Nick Clegg likely to save the world,come to think of it doubt any L Ds think that either.Not that D C or E M would make me any more enthusiastic.

    Really cynical today or maybe realistic.

    Not blaming you Mark but your realistic blogs at the moment of where we are is making me very pessimistic,think you must have a optimistic blog coming soon.

  • Sooty - that's a bit cynical, surely?  But if you are cynical then the last thing you should want is for sensible people to be absent when they might have some influence.  I wonder what Nick Clegg's brief is for his attendance?

  • Hi Mark

    I have already emailed him on this but will do so again. I have pulled this summary down off the Guardian website re Rio as I think the summary of the deterioration of our position useful and the deterioration of our ambition (in the face of national sovereignty/industrial power whether it be USA or China).

    Guardian Rio+20       How does it compare with 1992?

    Rio+20 is much bigger than its predecessor, but it has also been criticised for being vaguer and less ambitious. The earlier Earth summit resulted in the landmark conventions on climate change and biodiversity, as well as a host of other influential documents. This time, however, organisers do not expect any legally binding treaties. Instead, they hope nations will agree to a set of shared principles, landmarks and goals and initiate a process to define what it means to be sustainable.

    Why is another mega-conference necessary?

    In the past 20 years, the world's environment has continued to deteriorate. According to the most recent Living Planet report, global demand for natural resources has doubled since 1996 and that is now 50% higher than the regenerative capacity of the planet.

    Meanwhile, carbon emissions have increased 40% in the past 20 years, biodiversity loss is accelerating and one in six people remain undernourished. Without a new path of development and a change in consumption patterns, the pressure on ecosystems and poor communities is set to intensity in the future as the global population is projected to rise from the current 7 billion to 9 billion by 2050."

    Also Mark I am trying to put the issue of Severn Estuary and tapping its potential on the agenda of the Bristol Mayor campaign; clearly UK's failure to seriously harness wind wave and solar is a strategic national issue. After 25 years of debate it is really time for a decision re the Severn; the lack of a coherent position from the anti barrage camp is not helpful.

  • Well it is not a accurate description to call them world leaders as someone said connected with these sort of meetings"the only thing worse than having lots of meetings and getting no result is not having any more meetings"

    None of these meetings seem to get positive results whether E U or all the worlds politicians.

    It seems we are really clutching at what in context are short straws from individuals doing great work and of course the RSPB usually does lots of fantastic work which I hope they stay away from things not connected closely with what they were set up for all those years ago namely birds,that to me is what the B in RSPB means and there is plenty there to be getting on with especially with birds in England going extinct.