Hello,

I've started my new job as Conservation Director of the RSPB today. 

I feel lucky to be doing a job that I love with a bunch of brilliant people around me. 

My challenge is simple: to try to protect and build on Mark Avery's legacy and do more to look after the millions of species with with we share this planet.   Mark has made an enormous contribution to the RSPB and nature conservation over the past quarter of a century.  Having worked with him closely for more than a decade - he was my boss for the last seven - I, and I know many others, will miss his passion, insight and plain-speaking.

One thing I won't thank Mark for is the in-tray that I have inherited.  Those of you who have enjoyed reading his top twenty sticky issues will appreciate that the environment movement, and the RSPB in particular, has its work cut out to help and cajole governments to meet their ambitious commitment to halt biodiversity loss and begin its recovery by the end of the decade.  The political climate is not easy - there is currently little money to go around, successive governments have pursued a deregulatory agenda and pressures on modern life mean that there is less time for  people to stop, think and appreciate the wonders of the natural world.  But I am an optimist: most of the problems facing wildlife - from non-native species to climate change - are fixable.  We know what needs to be done, but often leadership and political will are lacking.

I will work with my new boss, Mike Clarke, to ensure that the RSPB does whatever it needs with political intelligence, creativity and courage.  I am sure that any of you reading this will tell me when we fall short.

 

Parents
  • Agree with Bob,we seem to be agreeing a lot at the moment and it is easy for us to give advice.One thing I think would help is if people stopped trying to put farmers on the back foot,unless RSPB strives for good relationship with farmers wildlife will be the loser.I realise that the N F U probably seems indifferent to wildlife but individual farmers please themselves what they do.

    Think you may know but if not look into the number of birds attracted to patches of land sown with wild bird seed mixtures and compare that with near barren field boundaries,now if the RSPB pushed for grants to go that way bird numbers would improve,the evidence strangely enough is there on your own Arne reserve,have a word with Paul and Rob,by the way I think the RSPB does great almost all the time but one or two things can still be improved.  

Comment
  • Agree with Bob,we seem to be agreeing a lot at the moment and it is easy for us to give advice.One thing I think would help is if people stopped trying to put farmers on the back foot,unless RSPB strives for good relationship with farmers wildlife will be the loser.I realise that the N F U probably seems indifferent to wildlife but individual farmers please themselves what they do.

    Think you may know but if not look into the number of birds attracted to patches of land sown with wild bird seed mixtures and compare that with near barren field boundaries,now if the RSPB pushed for grants to go that way bird numbers would improve,the evidence strangely enough is there on your own Arne reserve,have a word with Paul and Rob,by the way I think the RSPB does great almost all the time but one or two things can still be improved.  

Children
No Data