Am looking forward to today.  I have a meeting with our Council this morning which is always fun.  And tonight I am giving a talk to the South East England Agricultural Society.  We are debating whether conservation is compatible with intensive farming.

I am not sure what sort of reception to expect, but I am sure it will be colourful evening.  Judging by the state of the farmland bird and farmland butterfly indices, you could conclude that it is not possible to reconcile seemingly competing interests.  But it is always worth remembering that it was farming practices that allowed many of the species which we now value to flourish.  Many species even owe their vernacular names to their association with agriculture: cornflower and corn bunting to name but two. 

But as we became better at producing food from our land - a fourfold increase in yield since 1945 - and as the Common Agriculture Policy exerted its influence, farmland wildlife suffered. 

Great efforts have been made by many farmers over the past decade to try and reverse the declines but alas, the two biological indicators still show numbers are bumping along at the bottom of the graph.  Some of the solutions are in our grasp - environmental stewardship can be made to work harder, payment rates for these schemes need to provide sufficient incentive for farmers to take up the right options and the new CAP must, of course, be made fit for purpose.

Given that so much of our nation is farmed, it is pretty clear that, if we want to recover farmland wildlife, we have no option other than to find harmonious coexistence between nature and farming.  This is why I am so pleased that Defra, in its Natural Environment White Paper, committed to explore the question about how to improve productivity whilst enhancing the envirionment.

With luck, we should get a chance to explore some of the solutions at tonight's debate.

I'll let you know how I get on.

Do you think that it is possible to increase productivity whilst enhancing the environment? If so how? If not, what do we do?

It would be great to hear your views.

 

Parents
  • I believe the key is rotations and people eating less meat. Farm subsidies should be entirely decoupled and linked to less intensive farming systems, rotations and mixed farming and focused across Europe on what the Society for Nature Conservation describes as areas of High Natural Value.

    Peter Plover 

Comment
  • I believe the key is rotations and people eating less meat. Farm subsidies should be entirely decoupled and linked to less intensive farming systems, rotations and mixed farming and focused across Europe on what the Society for Nature Conservation describes as areas of High Natural Value.

    Peter Plover 

Children
No Data