Triggered by the news that Natural England had issued the first ever licence for the destruction of a buzzard nest at the request of a pheasant shooting estate, a colleague pointed me in the direction of a blog from Matthew Taylor (Chief Executive of the RSA) about how to restore trust in public institutions.  In it, Matthew says...

"Modern institutions – especially those which people believe should be expected to act in the public interest – must seek to make decisions as if they are operating in a glass box. (NB: This is not the same as arguing for total transparency. Indeed greater openness is more likely to be the consequence than the cause of more ethical organisational behaviour).

If an organisation which claims to be ethical is making decisions on a basis which the public would not understand or condone then it is ever more likely, sooner or later, that these decisions and the dodgy thinking behind them will be exposed, further eroding trust in institutions."

Makes you think, doesn't it?

Parents
  • Sounds as if N E have allowed perhaps culling of 10,000 approx of GBBGulls perhaps over a period of 30 years on a estate owned by Duke of Westminster,story thought up was to protect water quality,nothing at all to do with Grouse chick predation,oh yeah.

    Story something along those lines anyway.

Comment
  • Sounds as if N E have allowed perhaps culling of 10,000 approx of GBBGulls perhaps over a period of 30 years on a estate owned by Duke of Westminster,story thought up was to protect water quality,nothing at all to do with Grouse chick predation,oh yeah.

    Story something along those lines anyway.

Children
No Data