This is a guest blog by Jeff Knott, Head of Nature Policy marking the enormous achievement by the campaign to ban grouse shooting. Over 100,000 people have now signed this petition to ban driven grouse shooting. This is a huge achievement from everyone involved, including of course the petitions creator, my former boss, Mark Avery. What makes it all the more impressive is that this is a genuine grassroots movement. It’s not the result of a coordinated campaign by a big conservation organisation. Its support has grown organically, as groups of people have flocked to its message. We have not called for a ban, our position is to press reform through licensing but we are under no illusion ... this is a spectacular achievement this is a powerful message that will not be ignored. So what happens next? Well, having secured the magic 100,000 signatures, something only a tiny handful of petitions manage, there will be a parliamentary debate on the issue. The RSPB will actively promote this to MPs, encouraging them to attend the debate and emphasising why change is vital. We don’t believe a ban is inevitable, so in the briefing, we will highlight our view that licensing is the best way to secure these changes and talk about why this approach could work. The best way for law-abiding shoots to avoid a future ban, is to embrace licensing and deliver meaningful change. We will also ask our supporters to write to their MPs, asking them to attend the debate and speak positively. We should all be realistic. This debate is unlikely to lead to an immediate change. I’d be amazed if either a ban or licensing was introduced off the back of it. However, it can still make a huge positive contribution to moving the debate forward. 100,000 signatures for change, backed by a strong debate where the necessity and options are clearly set out can be a major turning point in the fight for our hen harriers and our uplands. That fight will need to go on and we will of course continue to be part of it, as I’m sure everyone who signed this petition will too. This isn’t the end, but it might be the beginning of the end. So congratulations to everyone involved in the petition. Now let’s work together to make the debate a success and then to secure the changes we need to see.
This is a guest blog by Jeff Knott, Head of Nature Policy marking the enormous achievement by the campaign to ban grouse shooting.
Over 100,000 people have now signed this petition to ban driven grouse shooting. This is a huge achievement from everyone involved, including of course the petitions creator, my former boss, Mark Avery.
What makes it all the more impressive is that this is a genuine grassroots movement. It’s not the result of a coordinated campaign by a big conservation organisation. Its support has grown organically, as groups of people have flocked to its message.
We have not called for a ban, our position is to press reform through licensing but we are under no illusion ... this is a spectacular achievement this is a powerful message that will not be ignored.
So what happens next? Well, having secured the magic 100,000 signatures, something only a tiny handful of petitions manage, there will be a parliamentary debate on the issue.
The RSPB will actively promote this to MPs, encouraging them to attend the debate and emphasising why change is vital. We don’t believe a ban is inevitable, so in the briefing, we will highlight our view that licensing is the best way to secure these changes and talk about why this approach could work. The best way for law-abiding shoots to avoid a future ban, is to embrace licensing and deliver meaningful change.
We will also ask our supporters to write to their MPs, asking them to attend the debate and speak positively.
We should all be realistic. This debate is unlikely to lead to an immediate change. I’d be amazed if either a ban or licensing was introduced off the back of it. However, it can still make a huge positive contribution to moving the debate forward. 100,000 signatures for change, backed by a strong debate where the necessity and options are clearly set out can be a major turning point in the fight for our hen harriers and our uplands.
That fight will need to go on and we will of course continue to be part of it, as I’m sure everyone who signed this petition will too. This isn’t the end, but it might be the beginning of the end.
So congratulations to everyone involved in the petition. Now let’s work together to make the debate a success and then to secure the changes we need to see.
It takes two to work together, and RSPB's genuine (if misguided) attempt to try and make the Hen Harrier plan work has been brutally re-buffed by a grouse shooting industry that seems to have had no intention of shifting one inch, leading to not one successful pair of Hen Harrier on a grouse moor in England this year.
RSPB should not have to take the lease: it is extraordinary under the circumstances that NT is even proposing to re-let its moor for shooting in the Peak after all that has happened: NT need successful Hen harriers on their land far more than they need the money from the shooting lease as they are struggling badly to catch up with anything like a positive reputation in this area - at least RSPB, through heroic efforts, has managed to protect at least one pair of HH on its land - NT have far more moorland and need to do far, far better.