Everyone's talking about white-tailed eagles, it seems. Even my taxi driver this morning in London had a view - amazingly he lives in Suffolk! And for what it's worth, he was very much in favour of the reintroduction scheme.
There are some great comments on my earlier blogs on this subject including one posted yesterday by Derek Moore which it is well worth reading for its forthright nature.
Tom Tew, the Natural England Chief Scientist, was on the radio earlier this week dispelling some myths and spreading some common sense and you can listen to it for the next few days by following this link.
On the more sceptical end of things, following Libby Purves's not very accurate article in the Times there have been two letters published on the subject in this same newspaper, one by Songbird Survival and the other by the Game and Wildlife Conservation Trust. Neither is very positive about the reintroduction which appears to be The Times's own line since it hasn't seen fit to publish any contrary views although we know they have received some.
The Daily Telegraph published one article on the subject which took the Robin Page line - funny that, he writes for the Telegraph! - including the view that there is scant evidence that white-tailed eagles used to live in East Anglia. Well we know that is a myth.
What is lacking is any evidence to back up the claims of Robin Page and others that white-tailed eagles will do harm to livestock or wildlife. The comments posted here on my blog (some from true experts in the field) , and all the discussions I have seen, suggest that the landowners of Suffolk have nothing to fear from eagles and that the wider public have much to look forward to in respect of a beautiful bird and the economic benefit that it will bring with it in terms of tourism revenue.
On Mull, an RSPB economic study indicated that the white-tailed eagles brought in annually about £1.5m to the local economy - we would now think that figure is closer to £2m per annum.
If there is hard evidence from where white-tailed eagles currently live that they might do harm in Suffolk then let us please see that evidence now. That's one of the things that a consultation period is for. The RSPB is keen to see any evidence on this subject, but uninformed hysterical opposition to what is, let's face it, just a big bird, in the early days of the 21st century seems very sadly misplaced.
A love of the natural world demonstrates that a person is a cultured inhabitant of planet Earth.
Derek Moore I am really surprised by you saying farmers and landowners have had to be dragged kicking and screaming to accept agri-environment schemes,these type of comments are believed and then mislead everyone.
The facts are that all these schemes are voluntary so it is simple if you want the money you agree with what is asked.
No way can voluntary schemes get people kicking and screaming.
As a retired farmer I am appalled at all comments that come from people really badly informed who think they know better than farmers.
Wonder if anyone knows or has bothered to ask why farmers took hedges out.
Farmers have since grown hundreds of miles of hedges where they have been needed,wonder why no one comments on that.
If you look back over a 1,000 years you will see that farmers have been the best conservationist by miles and the modern conservationist is a relative new thing and while they do a certain amount of good in the big scheme of things it is small fry.Compared to sterile towns etc the farmland is really alive.
I find it really hard to understand how people think they know so much better than farmers about farming when it never crosses my mind that I know more about other peoples occupations and of course all these ridiculous quotes are believed by general public.