I got off a train at Wellingborough station at noon on Thursday and was talking on the 'phone as I tried to remember where I'd left my car on Monday morning.
I couldn't remotely describe myself as birdwatching at that time and yet I noticed a flock of birds flying in the distance. Something about them made me look closer and even though they were distant, I knew they were waxwings - about 50 of them.
I sat in my car talking on the 'phone and as I did the waxwings did a fly-past removing any doubt - although there wasn't any doubt really.
In a non-waxwing winter I might not have been as tuned in to these birds as I clearly am now, but even that brief distant initial view was enough. I am tuned in to the natural world. I spot waxwings even though I am not consciously looking for waxwings, and I hear birds calling or singing even though I am not actively listening for them. And I can't quite understand why everyone else isn't tuned in like me. But I also know that there is too much of the natural world from which I am tuned out. What plants or insects do I ignore through bad tuning? I must do something about that. But for now, I do have waxwings.
A love of the natural world demonstrates that a person is a cultured inhabitant of planet Earth.
The BTO do have numbers for wintering lapwings and the last graph I saw showed increases over the last twenty-thrity years.
Farmland is important habitat for wintering lapwings and it is only right that it should be monitored to properly assess the impact of changes in agriculture on bio-diversity.
The fact it isn't reinforces my suspicion that conservation NGOs focus in on the negative trends and ignore the positive ones.
As for events in foreign parts distorting patterns that the FBI indicate, as you know there are species on the FBI that are affected by were they winter or migrate from,
as for your opening remarks, shall we analyse data or shall we trade insults?
Paysan savant