Last Saturday I was glad to see two letters published in the Independent newspaper. Both were replying to an original letter by Guy Smith, a well-known and vocal farmer from Essex.
Mr Smith's letter was basically saying that although some species of birds have declined on farmland (I think he does accept that they have) others have increased significantly - particularly crows, magpies and raptors.
One of the replies was from another farmer, a Mr Harrison from Northumberland. Mr Smith's letter didn't please Mr Harrison at all and he wrote as follows: 'I cringe with embarrassment at the terrifyingly crass response to this vital issue by my "fellow" farmer, Guy Smith...' and his letter ends thus : 'It is sad that some farmers are defensive of their tragic modern role as a downtrodden link in a chain of huge chemical corporations, ruthless "food" manufacturers, and giant retailers.'.
The second letter was from a Mr Palmer from Nottinghamshire who may or may not be a farmer but is clearly a land owner who knows his birds. Mr Palmer suggests that better care of hedgerows should be required of farmers and that this would replace some of the invertebrate life that has all too often been lost from farmland.
Now you must make your own mind up about the rights and wrongs of the issues discussed. In fact, although I have had many a good-humoured difference of opinion with Guy Smith the point he makes in his letter is not completely off the mark even if it isn't completely on target either. But what I did enjoy was seeing a farmer speaking out so strongly and clearly for nature as Mr Harrison did. If the RSPB had written his letter then we would have been called anti-farmer whereas that is not a criticism that can be levelled at 'fellow' farmers.
Guy Smith is an NFU Communication Spokesman, and I see he was talking at the Suffolk NFU Annual meeting last week on 'Better communication for the NFU and farming.'. I wonder how much Guy Smith had to do with the NFU's response to the consultation on the Natural Environment White Paper.
The NFU's line, unless I have misinterpreted it (so do read it yourself), is that the environment is fine and that the big issue now is food production. I don't expect much environmental sense from the NFU and I don't find much compassion or understanding of wildlife issues in this response. I wonder what Mr Palmer and Mr Harrison would think of it. I wonder what Sooty thinks of it? I wonder what other readers of this blog think of it. I wonder what the average NFU member thinks of it. And I wonder what the public - who pays for the Single Farm Payment and agri-environment payments - might think of it.
The NFU line certainly flies against the Defra line of biodiversity being a top priority and 'getting more from less' so I also wonder what Defra Ministers might make of it.
When the NFU starts from the position that there isn't a problem then there is little common ground with conservationists. Little wonder that our best moments with farmers are working with those farmers who realise that there is a problem and are keen to put biodiversity back into our countryside. They are the farmers who are true farming leaders.
A love of the natural world demonstrates that a person is a cultured inhabitant of planet Earth.
In relation to the comments about wildlife and hedgerows , FWAG produce an excellent leaflet about hedgerow management
www.fwag.org.uk/.../TIS3_Hedgerow_management_-_E2005.\
pdf
However in this part of the country (N. cumbria) very few hedgerows are managed in this wildlife friendly way. I would go as far as saying that the majority of hedgerows are almost wildlife free zones at least as far as our visiting winter bird migrants, Most hedgerows seem to be cut annually and are kept in a manicured form which doesn't allow the development of fruits and berries. This was brought home to me the other day when I was walking alongside a tall hedge covered in berries. There were hundreds of blackbirds, redwings and fieldfares and also a good number of bullfinches as well, The next hedge which was low and heavily trimmed held no birds at all.
i enjoy wildlife photography and know from experience that hedges with a taller diverse structure provide feeding and breeding habitats for many many times more bird, insects and mammals . Something needs to be done to ensure any environmental payments for maintaining boundaries are not wasted and are targeted at producing good wildlife friendly hedges.
The entry level stewardship conditions state that hedges should not be cut more than once in every 2 years. This certainly rarely happens as the vast majority are being cut annually and therefore some form of policing needs to take place to ensure that the environmental payment conditions are being followed