You join us at a tense stage in the long-running campaign to protect the unique and distinctive natural environment of the Dungeness peninsula from the threat of airport expansion.
Welcome to the Saving Special Places blog – do have a rummage through the posts of the last six months. You will find several stories about our work to ensure that the best and most important wildlife sites in the UK and overseas are protected from harm and placed at the heart of decisions that affect them. Thanks for visiting these pages – I hope you’ll become a regular.
Anyway – back to Lydd.
Just a few weeks ago on 3 March the local authority (Shepway District Council) took a decision to approve two planning applications, one for a runway extension, another for a new terminal building. Councillors took this decision in the face of a clear recommendation from their own officers and Natural England to refuse the applications, mainly on environmental grounds. You can find out more on the background of the case by clicking here.
The RSPB has been active at Dungeness for over 100 years – initially employing watchers to protect nesting seabirds. Our Dungeness nature reserve is our oldest existing site, though we had to give up an earlier one nearby because of damage caused by land drainage. The history of the peninsula is one of some success but also serious setbacks. Uncontrolled housing and leisure developments in the middle years of the 20th century saw the end of Dungeness as the last breeding location in the UK of Kentish plovers. Stone curlews, so sensitive to disturbance and housing development also deserted the area.
Add to the mix military training, gravel extraction and a couple of nuclear power stations and it’s remarkable that so much nature has survived. Travel to Dungeness and visit an other world. Vast skies, the wind-shaped landscape dotted with small bungalows black-painted to resist the salt spray, the looming bulk of the power stations and the coming and going of tiny trains on the Romney Hythe and Dymchurch light railway. And birds – everywhere. Packs of loafing gulls and flotillas of ducks catch the eye but time spent quietly and patiently reveals so much more. A wheatear might fly before you, one of the early migrants heralding a new spring. Your gaze may follow fingers pointing out a bittern flying low over the reads on cupped wings.
The arching shingle ridges built by the sea, create a miniature world of plants and creatures that is fragile even to an ill-judged footstep. A Lilliputian rainforest of lichens and mosses inhabited by rare insects, some found nowhere else in the UK. It’s a landscape of contrasts, of land and sea, of little and large of ancient and modern. It challenges our sense of scale and beguiles our senses. It’s open landscape means it bares the scars of its history visibly, some healing, some still raw.
Lydd airport is currently used by around 3000 passengers a year – plans would boost this to half a million, with an aspiration to go on up to 2 million passengers per year. The assessment of the impact of this development on the fragile nature of Dungeness – carried out by consultants for the local authority and backed by Natural England – led to the planning officers of Shepway District Council recommending refusal of the planning application. This is the backdrop to the councillor’s decision to approve the expansion.
The threat of a full-on airport goes beyond just the impact on the special nature of Dungeness – the quality of life of the people that live there and the inexorable cranking up of the contribution aviation makes to climate change are also significant issues.
The pursuit of economic development was the context that overwhelmed consideration of risks to the natural environment, and of course jobs matter and will be at the forefront of the mind of elected councillors. We believe that Dungeness’ natural environment should be placed at the heart of any economic renaissance in the area, not further sacrificed to establish a fundamentally unsustainable industry. Many communities have come to learn the hard way that airports make challenging neighbours. Shepway still has a choice.
This decision was disappointing – but is only a milestone on a longer journey. The RSPB believes that the decision by Shepway councillors potentially contravenes key elements of UK and EU laws. Additionally, the decision is both regionally and nationally controversial and will have significant impacts outside the immediate locality of the airport. Taken together, these factors means that the airport expansion plans should be called in by the Secretary of State for determination at a public inquiry:
Conflict with UK and EU law - When councillors decided to approve the airport expansion plans, they did not fulfill their legal requirement properly to consult Natural England.
Regional, national and international controversy - An expanded airport at Lydd risks adversely affecting internationally protected wildlife sites. Therefore, approving the plans to expand Lydd Airport would clearly be controversial regionally, nationally and in a European context.
Wider impacts - By its nature, the airport’s expansion is bound to have impacts outside the immediate locality. These will include the likely damage to both the SPA and SAC, increases in road traffic and noise, and the impact that the increased emission of greenhouse gases will have on climate change.Add your voice to the call for a public inquiry.
If you believe that the decision to develop a large airport next to an internationally important wildlife site is wrong, please write to the Government Office for the South East to request the plans for expanding Lydd Airport be called-in for a Public Inquiry. Please refer to the three reasons given above in your letter.
Please write to: Jennie Gilks Sustainable Communities Directorate Planning Casework Manager (Surrey and Kent) Government Office for the South East Bridge House 1 Walnut Tree Close Guildford GU1 4GA
We are such a small island and I believe we have enough airports, rail links, etc. to sustain us. Our green areas are daily being ripped up for buildings/houses and our wild life are struggling as it is not to mention our beautiful landscape (or what is left of it). I agree with IAMBDC - where are these passengers going to come from? Has there been an exodus from other towns/villages coming to live in the area? Did the public by their thousands request an airport?