Old thread here: http://www.rspb.org.uk/community/chat/f/2542/t/22684.aspx
Because the original thread has, fittingly enough, 'gone bad', it's time for a new 'Bad pics' thread. Here, we celebrate the very worst of our wildlife photography. The subject matter is always brilliant, but the photos are very much not. If it's out of focus, chopped in half, frighteningly under- or over-exposed or terrible in some other way, it belongs here :)
Here's my first (first of many, no doubt) contribution to the new thread, a Goldcrest taken at Barnes yesterday. You need only minor incompetence to take a blurry photo, and the same to take a really under-exposed photo, but to do both in one go requires a special level of cackhandedness.
My blog: http://mazzaswildside.blogspot.co.uk/
My Flickr page: https://www.flickr.com/photos/124028194@N04/
Hubby thought it was lots of Deer lol
Well he didn't have bins or a camera lol
(Pardon the Scottish Accent)
Billysdad said:Oh Deer!
I guess that didn't buck the trend.....
Mike
Flickr: Peak Rambler
There's always got to be a twig and leaf .., or two,,,,,, or 53 in the way when you see some Kingfishers. ! This one was enjoying his fish without chips lunch today.
_________________________________________________________________________
Regards, Hazel
Glad to see that other people have that problem, and the world's not just picking on me ...