Old thread here: http://www.rspb.org.uk/community/chat/f/2542/t/22684.aspx
Because the original thread has, fittingly enough, 'gone bad', it's time for a new 'Bad pics' thread. Here, we celebrate the very worst of our wildlife photography. The subject matter is always brilliant, but the photos are very much not. If it's out of focus, chopped in half, frighteningly under- or over-exposed or terrible in some other way, it belongs here :)
Here's my first (first of many, no doubt) contribution to the new thread, a Goldcrest taken at Barnes yesterday. You need only minor incompetence to take a blurry photo, and the same to take a really under-exposed photo, but to do both in one go requires a special level of cackhandedness.
My blog: http://mazzaswildside.blogspot.co.uk/
My Flickr page: https://www.flickr.com/photos/124028194@N04/
A couple from a recent visit to Burton Mere
It dived just as I was taking its piccie. How rude....
A black headed gull nose diving across the water surface!
Mike
Flickr: Peak Rambler
It takes a special talent what with autofocus to get nothing in focus!
Pete
Birding is for everyone no matter how good or bad we are at it,enjoy it while you can
I still do take photos of hat spectacular quality, I'm just too modest to show them!
Kind regards, Ann
Sometimes it's more important to show that yes, you really did see a cuckoo in the UK, than to spend time on, you know, proper photography.
A ribbon of grass photobombed the intended subject
just think of the Jaws theme ! asuming these huge fish in the mere were Carp ? who were spawning
_____________________________________
Regards, Hazel
Unknown said:
Those carp photos are awesome, and definitely too good to be a bad pic.