Old thread here: http://www.rspb.org.uk/community/chat/f/2542/t/22684.aspx
Because the original thread has, fittingly enough, 'gone bad', it's time for a new 'Bad pics' thread. Here, we celebrate the very worst of our wildlife photography. The subject matter is always brilliant, but the photos are very much not. If it's out of focus, chopped in half, frighteningly under- or over-exposed or terrible in some other way, it belongs here :)
Here's my first (first of many, no doubt) contribution to the new thread, a Goldcrest taken at Barnes yesterday. You need only minor incompetence to take a blurry photo, and the same to take a really under-exposed photo, but to do both in one go requires a special level of cackhandedness.
My blog: http://mazzaswildside.blogspot.co.uk/
My Flickr page: https://www.flickr.com/photos/124028194@N04/
Unknown said:A great find. Shame it was so far away ... but your eyesight can't be that bad if you spotted that all the way out there ...
I heard someone mention it as they looked through their high quality and far reaching scope …… so I can't take the credit lol
_____________________________________
Regards, Hazel
Tony
https://www.flickr.com/photos/wherryman/
That could have gone better
One of us needs better reflexes ...
__________
Nige Flickr
That's a shame the AF didn't lock on to the kingy, they would have been brilliant photos.
Still good captures though.
Mike
Flickr: Peak Rambler
Some little blue tit, wouldn't come out, for ages....
Taken at Kensington gardens a few weeks ago. The only close-up photo I took of the great tit in my hand. A perfect opportunity missed due to bad focussing!
Always lovely to hand feed the birds and I used to feed them in the London Parks when on the rare occasion I visited the city until new signs were put up asking people not to feed the birds; I fully understand that food like bread which was being thrown into the Serpentine for the swans and ducks is very unhealthy and pollutes the water and that too many feral pigeons and ring-necked parakeets were causing a nuisance as their numbers grew so it was always a very contentious topic of discussion but somehow not to be able to offer seed to the Great Tits, Chaffinches, Blue Tits, etc., some of which will come to hand seemed to take some of the pleasure out of a park visit and it was all part of a park experience. Not sure why the Royal Parks can't have a small designated area in one of these large parks for visitors (especially young children) where they are allowed to feed the birds - they could ensure birds get the correct food by installing a vending type machine for seed (a rule that you don't bring your own food) and any profit could go towards upkeep of the area. I've seen vending machines with seed in couple of other places and also dedicated retail outlet on-site. I think Londoners must have been feeding birds in their city and parks for over 100 years, something which was always an accepted practice and although I do agree that much stricter rules need to be in place it would be nice if some a compromise could be made. Although I had taken seed with me I did heed the new signs and thus did not feed any bird.
This used to be the old message from Royal Parks (when you could feed the birds using their guidelines) they have not removed this from the web yet
This is the latest message from Royal Parks