The voluntary approach of the Hen Harrier Action Plan has failed, leaving licensing as the only viable option.
I’m generally very patient. My natural preference is to build partnerships and work to make positive change from the inside with those who want to abide by the law and deliver progress.
However, sometimes that approach simply doesn’t work and there can be no clearer example of that right now than hen harriers, where illegal killing of this rare bird remains its most significant threat.
The RSPB played a full part in the production of Defra’s Hen Harrier Action Plan and despite disagreeing with certain points (notably brood management), welcomed its publication earlier this year. However, at the time, I noted the need for immediate progress to help build trust in the approach.
Unfortunately this has not happened.
Image courtesy of Shay Connolly
In 2015, we were all extremely frustrated by there being just six successful hen harrier nests from 12 attempts in England. 2016 is on course to be much worse, with only three nests at the time of writing, none of which are on grouse moors.
Some will argue that the weather or vole population is to blame, however, early returns from the national hen harrier survey suggest numbers away from intensively managed grouse moors in north and west Scotland have done ok. We remain convinced that the primary reason for the hen harrier‘s continuing scarcity remains illegal killing.
Simply put, hen harriers (and other birds of prey) are illegally killed on some estates because they eat grouse. Crimes are committed to increase the number of grouse that can be shot. This year, there have been a series of depressingly predictable incidents in England and Scotland, the disappearance of the hen harriers ‘Chance’ and ‘Highlander’, the use of pole traps and the hen harrier decoy in the Peak District. And as well as hen harriers, it has also been a really bad year for red kites in North and West Yorkshire with several suspicious deaths. In addition, there are more cases working their way through the legal system.
All of this adds up to a picture which shows that the commitments made in the Hen Harrier Action Plan are not being delivered. People are still breaking the law and not enough is being done within the grouse shooting community to effect change.
Some will argue that we should be more patient as behavioural change takes time. But the hen harrier does not have time on its side and the longer hen harriers remain on the brink, the greater public antipathy towards intensive grouse shooting will become.
Hen harriers and other birds of prey in our uplands will not recover without a completely different approach.
We have therefore decided to withdraw our support from Defra’s Hen Harrier Action Plan.
We have come to this conclusion because we believe that reform to protect the hen harrier will only come through licensing of driven grouse shooting where, for example, crimes committed on estates managed for shooting should result in the withdrawal of their right to operate.
A licensing system isn’t about tarring everyone with the same brush, or blaming a whole community for the actions of the few. Quite the opposite: it is effectively a targeted ban that will stamp out illegal activity and drive up the environmental standards of shooting.
Law abiding estates have nothing to fear from this system and, indeed, I believe that it is in their own interests to champion such an approach. We believe that this is the only way to deliver a significant shift in attitudes and potentially secure a future for their sport. Licensing systems appear to work well in most other European countries, so why not here as well?
We fully support the current petition in Scotland and we would like to reinvigorate the call for Defra to introduce licensing in England too.
Of course, we will continue to work on the ground with our partners, especially raptor workers (who monitor and protect birds of prey), landowners who wish to see a progressive future, local people and the police to provide the most effective possible year round protection.
My preference is always for the partnership approach, but partnership requires action from both sides. In this case, that has failed. When shooting organisations are either unable or unwilling to lead the necessary change to rein in illegal activity, then reform must be delivered from outside. That is what we will now seek to do though promoting licensing.
I fully expect our critics (such as the grouse industry funded You Forgot The Birds) to push out a wearyingly predictable series of attacks on the RSPB in coming weeks. I can only imagine that this is designed to divert attention from criminal activity on some intensive grouse moors. But this won't shake our resolve to seek change.
An early opportunity to talk more about all of this will be at the Hen Harrier Day events. I’ll be at the Hen Harrier Day North East event at the RSPB's Saltholme reserve on Sunday 7 August, while my boss Mike Clarke will be at the event at Rainham Marshes on Saturday 6 August. Other RSPB representatives will be at various of the other events too. I hope to see many of you there and hopefully many more will be able to attend other events across the country.
Together, we can and will save our hen harriers.
Keith (we all know who you are), I have just read, again, your comments on this debate. I have tried to determine what positive contribution you have made in your critique of the hapless HHAP. I find very little.
It appears at some point that you consider this blog to be a personal conversation between yourself and Martin. You also spend a lot of words justifying your personal position and stating that you are merely (trying to) put the record straight. I think we all have the right to do that and that generally we don't upset individuals sensitivities. It is a very polite blog, sometimes robustly argued.
Many of us are, no doubt, long time members of the RSPB, and active volunteers, and sometimes support, and sometimes disagree, with their policies. From the number of 'like' ticks on your current thoughts perhaps, on this occasion, you are not representing the majority viewpoint.
I could see no evidence of bullying here.
Regards.
In the interests of balance, Keith, would you like to mention something about yourself being director of the anti-raptor group Songbird Survival? You always seem to miss that one out. I trust you will not regard such a straightforward question as being any form of bullying.
Simon Tucker,
Methinks you are labouring under the same misconception as Steve J (whoever he is) and protest too much. See, and more importantly reread and digest, properly, my Comment of 11:50 on 26 July below. I don’t speak for ‘…the Moorland Association, the GWCT and the other mouthpieces of the shooting industry…’ So, to reiterate, your questions, like those of Steve J – whoever he is – should be directed to those who can answer them.
As to whether I protest too much, well I will certainly protest when posters like Steve J (whoever he is), persist in trying to undermine my views by posting Comments impugning my motives and opinions. Steve J – whoever he is - has form in this respect and butts into my postings to others, in this instance to the Conservation Director. What you appear to consider as protesting too much is merely me putting the record straight, with supporting evidence. Steve J (and others) are notable for their subsequent silences when I do so, but tend to pop up again like a ‘whack-a-mole’ character the next time I post a Comment that does not conform to their fixed views and other prejudices. Such on-line harassment is a form of low-level bullying and abuse, and symptomatic of the On-line Disinhibition Effect (ODE) see here – http://tinyurl.com/hw3vwo8
ODE practices are corrosive and have no place on our Society’s website and blogs. I have raised this issue directly with the Conservation Director, and made recommendations as to how my, our, Society could counter the creeping and insidious rise in instances of ODE behaviour.
Like you, my wife and I have 30+ years of RSPB membership between us, and I am also a member of the BTO. Although not a ringer, I held a Schedule 1 licence to photograph birds at the nest (including hen harrier) for several years and acted as hide assistant for other Schedule 1 nest photographers for several years prior to that.
Finally, I condemn all wildlife crime and unlike many key-board warriors have taken direct action against it over the years - against bird trapping in Scotland, Malta and Cyprus, helped the Northern Constabulary secure a conviction against wild-life criminals (by recognising, recording and reporting their crime – some 27 years before BAWC reinvented the concept) and only last year furnished the authorities with a report, photos and samples of a dead hen harrier I found in the Scottish uplands. No signs of foul play in that particular instance according to the Police Service of Scotland and the Science and Advice for Scottish Agriculture experts who analysed the samples I collected (because no-one else was prepared to).
Keith Cowieson: methinks you do protest too much. Where is the condemnation of illegal persecution from the Moorland Association, the GWCT and the other mouthpieces of the shooting industry? All I ever see from them are offensive comment, social media attacks and, even, attempts to subvert the law of the land, against the RSPB, Mark Avery and anybody else who dares to ask them to ensure the members of the shooting industry stop breaking the law.
Simon Tucker
Martin, A bit late in commenting on this (computer issue) but nevertheless well done. Now is the time to push licensing harder and hopefully get a debate through Mark's petition. GWCT have hit back with a predictable comment but somehow it includes potential reintroduction of harriers into the UK from France. When was that considered?
The Cotswold Water park sightings website
My Flicker page