The voluntary approach of the Hen Harrier Action Plan has failed, leaving licensing as the only viable option.
I’m generally very patient. My natural preference is to build partnerships and work to make positive change from the inside with those who want to abide by the law and deliver progress.
However, sometimes that approach simply doesn’t work and there can be no clearer example of that right now than hen harriers, where illegal killing of this rare bird remains its most significant threat.
The RSPB played a full part in the production of Defra’s Hen Harrier Action Plan and despite disagreeing with certain points (notably brood management), welcomed its publication earlier this year. However, at the time, I noted the need for immediate progress to help build trust in the approach.
Unfortunately this has not happened.
Image courtesy of Shay Connolly
In 2015, we were all extremely frustrated by there being just six successful hen harrier nests from 12 attempts in England. 2016 is on course to be much worse, with only three nests at the time of writing, none of which are on grouse moors.
Some will argue that the weather or vole population is to blame, however, early returns from the national hen harrier survey suggest numbers away from intensively managed grouse moors in north and west Scotland have done ok. We remain convinced that the primary reason for the hen harrier‘s continuing scarcity remains illegal killing.
Simply put, hen harriers (and other birds of prey) are illegally killed on some estates because they eat grouse. Crimes are committed to increase the number of grouse that can be shot. This year, there have been a series of depressingly predictable incidents in England and Scotland, the disappearance of the hen harriers ‘Chance’ and ‘Highlander’, the use of pole traps and the hen harrier decoy in the Peak District. And as well as hen harriers, it has also been a really bad year for red kites in North and West Yorkshire with several suspicious deaths. In addition, there are more cases working their way through the legal system.
All of this adds up to a picture which shows that the commitments made in the Hen Harrier Action Plan are not being delivered. People are still breaking the law and not enough is being done within the grouse shooting community to effect change.
Some will argue that we should be more patient as behavioural change takes time. But the hen harrier does not have time on its side and the longer hen harriers remain on the brink, the greater public antipathy towards intensive grouse shooting will become.
Hen harriers and other birds of prey in our uplands will not recover without a completely different approach.
We have therefore decided to withdraw our support from Defra’s Hen Harrier Action Plan.
We have come to this conclusion because we believe that reform to protect the hen harrier will only come through licensing of driven grouse shooting where, for example, crimes committed on estates managed for shooting should result in the withdrawal of their right to operate.
A licensing system isn’t about tarring everyone with the same brush, or blaming a whole community for the actions of the few. Quite the opposite: it is effectively a targeted ban that will stamp out illegal activity and drive up the environmental standards of shooting.
Law abiding estates have nothing to fear from this system and, indeed, I believe that it is in their own interests to champion such an approach. We believe that this is the only way to deliver a significant shift in attitudes and potentially secure a future for their sport. Licensing systems appear to work well in most other European countries, so why not here as well?
We fully support the current petition in Scotland and we would like to reinvigorate the call for Defra to introduce licensing in England too.
Of course, we will continue to work on the ground with our partners, especially raptor workers (who monitor and protect birds of prey), landowners who wish to see a progressive future, local people and the police to provide the most effective possible year round protection.
My preference is always for the partnership approach, but partnership requires action from both sides. In this case, that has failed. When shooting organisations are either unable or unwilling to lead the necessary change to rein in illegal activity, then reform must be delivered from outside. That is what we will now seek to do though promoting licensing.
I fully expect our critics (such as the grouse industry funded You Forgot The Birds) to push out a wearyingly predictable series of attacks on the RSPB in coming weeks. I can only imagine that this is designed to divert attention from criminal activity on some intensive grouse moors. But this won't shake our resolve to seek change.
An early opportunity to talk more about all of this will be at the Hen Harrier Day events. I’ll be at the Hen Harrier Day North East event at the RSPB's Saltholme reserve on Sunday 7 August, while my boss Mike Clarke will be at the event at Rainham Marshes on Saturday 6 August. Other RSPB representatives will be at various of the other events too. I hope to see many of you there and hopefully many more will be able to attend other events across the country.
Together, we can and will save our hen harriers.
Three observations in reply to comments below from Keith Cowieson and Rob Yorke:
First, it's not premature to withdraw support now: there will have been plenty of hen harriers prospecting for safe places to nest within England this summer, and I'd have not been surprised to have seen ten or fifteen more pairs settle to nest successfully had the driven grouse moor industry allowed them to do so in peace. Instead, we have seen gas guns deployed to discourage birds from settling, pole traps erected to capture birds, lures used to bring birds to within shooting distance, deliberate disturbance with quads, and more and more illegal killing of birds of prey. Nothing has changed. Without this persecution, hen harriers would have settled to nest in good numbers, this summer.
Second, this debate has been going on and on, for years - grouse moor managers have known that it is illegal to persecute hen harriers and other birds of prey for many years. They have had ample time to absorb this simple fact. It doesn't take much time not to deploy a gas gun; one can not erect pole traps in no time at all; lures can be left at home in seconds; and one can save time by not running one's quad over favoured nesting areas and by leaving one's guns and poisons at home. In fact, avoiding persecution saves time - it doesn't take time.
Third, while I genuinely welcome your inputs here, and hope they will continue, what would be really, really great is if, rather than lamenting withdrawal of RSPB support for the failed Hen Harrier Plan, you could pen a few more blogs urging your game shooting constituency to end persecution and allow hen harriers and other birds of prey to recover. Where are your blog pieces and magazine articles condemning use of gas guns to displace hen harriers? Condemning the use of pole traps, lures, poisons and snipers? Why is the Hawk & Owl Trust, GWCT, BASC etc etc not vigorously campaigning to end persecution - to show genuine commitment to the Plan? Why? Because they're not genuinely committed.
Well done. Not before time! You have to stand up against criminals.
I supported the RSPB's decision to sign up to the Hen Harrier Action Plan and now support the decision to withdraw. I thought let's give the shooting community a chance to demonstrate its commitment and to give credibility to its claims about being a force for conservation good. We could at least expect persecution incidents to reduce, for grouse moors and their lobbyists to wave the banners about what they were doing and to have a little more hen harrier breeding success. Unless a few English grouse moors have something up their sleeves, we will have seen none of this. For this to happen in the first year just when one would expect all the stops being pulled out to justify the clamour for the RSPB to sign up, is strange to say the least.
I don't believe the lack of breeding success and no decrease in persecution incidents is down to the weather, lack of voles or rogue gamekeepers. Even with heavy natural predation in other places where Hen Harriers breed, there is more success here than on grouse moors where we should expect the opposite to be true with intensive predator control. The simple truth seems to be that there is no serious intent for change, no compromise on grouse densities and an unwillingness to consider that driven grouse moor management just might have some negative environmental consequences.
The RSPB will no doubt get the usual criticism both subtle and not so subtle about this decision to withdraw. The favourite one will probably be that it has caved into pressure from anti-shooting, animal rights activist, extremist, leftie townies with no understanding of the countryside and how it works. That is a lazy argument of no merit and adds nothing to the case for driven grouse shooting.
To have a Hen Harrier Action Plan in the first place suggests that grouse moor estates had something in their gift to deliver. Unless there is a dramatic last minute turn of fortunes for hen harrier breeding success (or even proven attempts) or clear evidence of hard work to protect hen harriers on grouse moors, it must be reasonable to assume they have failed to deliver, for whatever reason, their side of the bargain. We should also not forget that this is not just about hen harriers. The correlation between grouse moors, poor bird of prey breeding success and persecution stands out and has to be addressed as well.
IanW
Excellent! Glad the RSPB is joining the fight to save our raptors and other wildlife threatened by driven grouse shooting. If most of RSPB members signed both English and Scottish petitions the government will have to listen. (Over 1 million members I believe.) www.parliament.scot/.../PE01615
Well done RSPB. At last we might get somewhere.