The last few weeks has seen an intense focus on the uplands, especially in England. Central to this has been a growing and extremely welcome chorus to see the return of hen harriers to the rightful place as a breeding bird of our hills – the shockwaves of the last year’s failure to see any hen harrier nest successfully in England have, at long last, built a momentum for change.
In parallel the future of the English uplands, as a whole, is starting to get the attention it deserves. The common thread through this is the growing impact the driven (red) grouse shooting industry is having as some intensify the management of the uplands.
Raising the issues is one thing – the key question is what happens next? Let’s be under no illusion, the growing recognition that the absence of hen harriers and the wider environmental implications of the grouse industry is prompting strong reactions as calls for bans and boycotts grow.
I’ll be clear – the RSPB is not in that position, we want change and we want a positive reaction from the moorland landowners and managers.
That’s why we welcome today’s announcement by M&S that they are not going to stock red grouse until there is a code of practice in place and we welcome the opportunity to work with M&S and the Game and Wildlife Conservation Trust to move this forward.
This also exactly the same thinking behind our call for licensing of upland driven grouse shooting in England. Developed co-operatively, such a proposal builds confidence and provides a real route out of adversarial dialogue that has, for too long, characterised these issues.
This action by M&S is very welcome. It is important because coming from a responsible retailer it will help to demonstrate to the wider public that there is a real issue here and that it is not just bunch of eccentric "greens" that are driving this, which of course it is not.
As mentioned, I do think the RSPB is on the right track in calling for the licensing of driven grouse moors and not for their banning.
While the licensing requirement has to be pursued with real determination until a satisfactory result is obtained, at the same time I think it is important, as you say Martin, that adversarial dialogue is avoided. Such a course would not be productive. As any good manager will say it is important in any negotiation that there is a "win win" result otherwise what has been apprantly agreed will not "stick" in time.
I assume the next step is for real discussions to take place amongst the interested parties and this, at least at present, should be out of the pubilic eye to avoid political stances and set positions as much as possible.
We spend 90% of net income on conservation, public education and advocacy
The RSPB is a member of BirdLife International. Find out more about the partnership
© The Royal Society for the Protection of Birds (RSPB) is a registered charity: England and Wales no. 207076, Scotland no. SC037654