I've handed the reins of my blog over to Mark Avery for most of June. Mark's sharing the successes and challenges of saving nature around the world in the run up to the Rio+20 Earth Summit.

Everywhere you go you see wildlife, but some places are better than others. A cornerstone of nature conservation is to try to protect the very best places for wildlife.

The first National Park (NP) in the world was Yellowstone NP in Wyoming, Idaho and Montana, USA, and was designated in 1872. Across the Pacific Ocean, Australia’s first National Park was Royal NP south of Sydney in 1879. Virunga NP in the Democratic Republic of Congo was Africa’s first National Park and came into existence in 1925. Americans sometimes describe National Parks as ‘America’s best idea’ (although their inventor was the Scottish-born John Muir). The UK took up this idea rather belatedly with the Peak District NP in 1951.

In reality, there have long been areas set aside, and managed, for nature to thrive but originally these were seen as hunting preserves and over time the emphasis has shifted to protecting places for nature’s sake and so that people can enjoy the wildlife riches of the planet. 

National Parks are slightly different concepts in different countries, and across the world we have added to the complexity of the network of protected areas for wildlife by adding all sorts of new and varying designations and titles. In the UK we now have Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty, Areas of Special Scientific Interest (in Northern Ireland alone), Special Protection Areas for birds, Ramsar sites, Nature Improvement Areas and many many more. It’s an alphabet soup of designations and, I think, a list of off-putting and unappealing names.

Few people live further than a few miles from one of the c7000 Site of Special Scientific Interest (and ASSIs) in the UK and yet I doubt that 2% of people could name a single site let alone the one nearest to where they live. These designations, as designations, have not captured people’s attention or imagination. Somewhere along the line we forgot to give them a good image.

But although the woman on the Clapham omnibus will not be able to name her nearest SSSI I bet she will know of the existence of Wimbledon Common (which is her nearest SSSI) and may enjoy its open spaces and the breath of nature it brings into London. And I would be sure that most local voters would want Wimbledon Common to be protected more or less as it is for the future.

The mere survival of some of these wildlife areas in our crowded island says much for the effectiveness of the protected area system but we can also demonstrate that these designations have worked for the species they were designed to protect. A study published in the journal Science in 2007 showed that those species that had highest protection under the EU Birds Directive had fared better in the EU than outside the EU and had fared better in the years after the Directive came into force than they had before. And species fared best in those countries which had protected the greatest areas for them.

Enthusiasm for protected areas is growing and their proven success persuaded countries to commit, in Nagoya, Japan in October 2010, to targets to increase the global coverage of protected areas on land and sea by 2020.

It’s a pity that we didn’t put all the world’s protected areas in place soon after the USA kicked it all off in the late 19th century – the world would be richer in wildlife and for people now if we had. And it’s a pity that we conservationists have surrounded the whole process of protecting the best places for wildlife in such a welter of jargon and acronyms. But despite our slow start and horrible language we have systems for protecting wildlife sites across the planet that are effective – and that is something of which we all should be both grateful and proud.

However, whether John Muir succeeded in his mission to save the American soul from complete materialism is, perhaps, another matter.

If you’re worried about the damage being done to a local wildlife spot, but don't know what to do about it, have a look at our local planning packs. Our advice coupled with your local knowledge and personal experience may be all you need to step up and make a difference.

Dr Mark Avery is a former Conservation Director of the RSPB and now is a writer on environmental matters. We’ve asked Mark to write these 20 essays on the run up to the Rio+20 conference.  His views are not necessarily those of the RSPB.  Mark writes a daily blog about UK nature conservation issues.

  • Alistair - personally I agree with you to a great extent.  Your point backs up Sooty's above.  What does a UK NP mean for wildlife?  Can you tell that you are in a UK NP by its wonderful wildlife - only rarely, I would say?  The marine environment lags too far bahind land - future essays in this series willl talk about the marine environment.  I bet you have noticed that it is World Oceans Day on Friday?

  • So what does "National Park" or for that matter "Protection" mean?  The protection given to the Yellowstone is rather more effective than the Peak District! Ask the raptors how effective a protected area the Peak District NP is for them?  

    Protected areas should do what they say on the tin.  Effectively protect biodiversity or heritage.  As Minsmere and other RSPB reserves do.  Unfortunately in many cases in the UK all these designations have become an eyecatching label that does little more than sanction business as usual, whilst giving the illusion to people that action has been taken.

    In the marine sector it is even worse.  Almost no areas in the UK sea are fully protected for biodiversity (Lundy is almost the only exception).

    It is surely time for the NGOs to demand that protected areas deliver protection for biodiversity.  Also that fully protected nature reserves on buth land and sea are an important public asset which are popular with the public and work effectively for biodiversity (and the local economy).

  • Sooty - you have a point there (as always? almost always!). Our National Parks are not quite as focussed on wildlife as those in some other parts of the world.  And you are right that there have been some high profile bird of prey cases in the Peak District - very sadly.

  • Think perhaps in this country N Ps have more impact on what is allowed visually than improving wildlife.Lets face it the lovely Peak District has virtually no BOP.

  • redkite - thank you! I saw a couple of 'real' red kites whilst completing my second Breeding Bird Survey square this morning! Stay reading for more on 'special places' in a few days time, coral reefs, tropical rinforests, climate change and New York's water supply.