It's a sad day when your childhood hero, whose picture hangs in your downstairs loo, attacks the organisation you work for and whose mission you care passionately about. But, remarkably, Sir Ian Botham (who owns a shoot) has joined forces with others from the shooting community to launch a complaint to the Charity Commission regarding the RSPB's expenditure on fundraising as opposed to nature reserves.
When I saw the website that Sir Ian is fronting, I thought someone had hacked into his internet account again. Have a look for yourself here. You will quite quickly realise that this is not one of Beefy's infamous in-swinging yorkers that did for Rod Marsh et al in his devastating spell at Edgbaston in 1981*. There's a lot of nonsense written and some of it is actually quite funny - wondering why, for example, we don't spend more time promoting chickens. I think our charitable objects may stop short of permitting us to do chicken conservation.
But, before anyone dismisses this as a Botham long-hop, I am reminded that he managed to pick up quite a few wickets with his bad deliveries.
Any complaint to the Charity Commission, even if motivated by the fact that we have hardened our position on grouse shooting, deserves to be taken seriously.
The central charge is that only 24% of our charitable expenditure is on nature reserves and, in an outrageously lazy slog-sweep aside, that our reserves aren't any good for birds. Really?
Abernethy - one of 210 fabulous nature reserves (Andy Hay, rspb-images.com)
The RSPB is 125 years old this year. Throughout our history, we've always campaigned to change policy, legislation, attitudes, and behaviour. Yes, we started to acquire nature reserves in 1930 (Cheyne Court, Romney Marsh - yes, Romney not Rodney) and we now have the responsibility of looking after 15,000 species on 210 nature reserves across more than 150,000 hectares. We're proud of the work that we do on our reserves and I reject any suggestion that our dedicated team of staff and volunteers are 'ineffective'.
Yet, we've never believed that our nature reserves - brilliant as they are - will ever be sufficient to save threatened wildlife on their own. How can they be when they only cover 0.6% of the UK surface area? You we can't save nature by putting a fence around reserves and hoping the remaining 99.4% will take care of itself.
On the day that we hear of Beefy's attack, the UK Government also reported (see here) on progress of the wild bird indicator: woodland birds down 28% since 1970, seabirds down 24% since 1986, and farmland birds are now at their lowest level down 55% since 1970. We care about these declines, we want to do something about them and we know that we cannot rely on nature reserves alone.
Cirl bunting: a bird that we have, through working with farmers, helped to bring back from the brink (Andy Hay, rspb-images.com)
I am sorry Beefy, but that means we will spend money on researching why species are declining, we will work out what needs to be done to help them, we will work with farmers to advise them on how to manage their land for wildlife, we will save special places by fighting inappropriate development and yes, heretical it may be to some, we will seek to influence governments to change policy. And you know what, we will continue to try to grow the market of people that are interested in nature conservation - the motivation behind our Giving Nature a Home advertising - or, through Vote for Bob, to urge politicians to give nature a fair showing in their manifestos. The threats to the natural world are so great that we have to use modern techniques to ensure nature's voice is heard.
We've done this for 125 years and we plan to continue. Our members will expect nothing less.
And if you keep bowling us long hops, we'll crash them to the boundary. And, if you continue to slur us, we'll get our own Bob Willis to bowl at you.
Howzat?
*If you don't know your cricket, Edgbaston was the second of the three tests in the 1981 Ashes series where Sir Ian was named man of the match for his match-winning spell of 5 wickets for 1 run in 28 balls. You can watch it again here.
I am sure that you wouldn't expect all 1 million members of the RSPB to write in support of what you write but can I say that here is one that fully supports what the RSPB does, even though I don't agree with every single thing they say. As a member I consider the political and educational impact that the RSPB has is a major part of its work. To be able to fight for legislation and against inappropriate development is so important.
The big issue at the moment is the illegal killing of birds of prey although there are many others. You will know that I was involved in part of the police wildlife crime and PAW changes back in the 90s. That movement was instigated and supported by the RSPB and without them it would not have succeeded. That was a political move that I would have expected from them and they didn't let me down.
I just get the feeling that the conservation / shooting divide is going to get worse before it gets better. I have nothing against shooting and it does a lot of good in places, although I am getting the feeling that you don't attack people unless you have something you don't want them to find.
The Cotswold Water park sightings website
My Flicker page
Well said Martin, I am sure all RSPB members and many more besides support what you say. Such a complaint is really quite amazing if not ridiculous and vindictive but I think it does show the RSPB's campaign to save the hen harrier and reverse the degredation of many uplands is really having an effect. If this were not so, the shooting community would not have bothered to make this complaint.
The bottom line is, that all we, the RSPB, are asking is that grouse moor owners and the shooting community obey the law and stop killing birds of prey including hen harriers.
I belive it was Dr. Johnson who said "the true test of a man's character is what he does when he knows he won't be found out".
I think this has some relevance in this case.
redkite