Yesterday, I opened the latest Natura 2000 newsletter (providing an update from the European Commission on nature and biodiversity) and my eyes fell again on a graph showing the coverage of protected wildlife sites across the European Union.  The UK is floundering at the bottom of the league table in terms of percentage of national area covered by either Special Areas of Conservation or Special Protection Areas (just 7.2%).  I think this is worth repeating.  We are 27th out of 27 Member States in terms of land protected for wildlife! So - no, we are not gold-plating the implementation of the Nature Directives, Mr Osborne. 

And this prompted me to revisit one of the cases being used to argue that the Habitats Regulations place a "ridiculous cost on British business" - dredging in Falmouth harbour.  If you have not done so, I encourage you read my colleague Tony Whitehad's post on the subject hereIt is clear that there are options to deliver what the port authority wants - opening up the harbour to allow larger ships to dock - whilst protecting the internationally important maerl beds.  I make no comment on the desirability of cruise liners being able to dock in Falmouth, simply that sustainable development is about finding ways to enable economic activity to continue whilst maintaining the natural assets we have.  The Habitats Regulations help make this happen.

Moving on from Falmouth, I am off to Grantham today to meet up with colleagues to discuss latest developments in our Futurescapes programme.  Like other organisations, we are doing our bit to deliver landscape scale conservation.  I am looking forward to seeing how our new magnificent seven dedicated Futurescapes officers are getting on.  These posts have been funded by the Life programme of the European Union in recognition of the contribution that this initiative can offer to the protection of habtiats and species of European importance.  I look forward to hearing about progress and seeing some smiling faces from those colleagues who will be contributing to the successful Nature Improvement Areas announced two weeks ago.

Finally, a word in praise of the fantastic Dame Fiona Reynolds who announced today that she will be leaving her post of Director General of the National Trust in order to be Master of Emmanuel College, Cambridge.  She's not going just yet - she takes up her University duties in autumn 2013.  Hopefully that gives her enough time to help all of us see off the worst of the Government's proposals for planning reform. I have known Fiona since I joined the environment sector in 1996.  In that time she has played an increasingly important leadership role, first in running CPRE, then turning around the fortunes of the Trust and perhaps most importantly standing up for the protection of special places in last summer's debates about the National Planning Policy Framework.  She'll be missed from the sector, but the environment's loss is academia's gain. 

  • Think Dame Fiona Reynolds did wonderful work at N T,pity she is going as still some work to do regarding leases.She changed attitudes at N T in my opinion from being a self righteous group to a caring of its membership group,well done to her.

  • Thanks both and thank you Sue for the pictoral reminder of the Costa Concordia.  It still seems like a still from a film...

  • redkite,

    I agree - and do "large cruise liners" want to visit Falmouth in any case? The Costa Concordia disaster is likely to have cruise lines rethinking whether they really want to bring their vessels into close proximity with rocky coastlines, when the outcome can be this.......

    www.giglionews.it/.../webcam-giglio-porto-panoramica.html

    NB You need to look at this link in European daylight hours

  • Floundering in Falmouth sounds to me like a classic case of the the developer, in this case the port authority, deciding on the option they want to purse without really much effort to properly assess all the options and how best to ensure any mitigating measures will be really effective. In other words their assessment phase, which is important in any major development such as this, has been at best less than thorough and at worst somewhat skimped. In such situations it is very easy for developers and politicians so inclined ,to blame "the regulations". It is the easy way out.