At last year’s AGM, the Chair of the RSPB’s Council announced that we would be reviewing our policy on gamebird shooting. Today, I provide details about how we shall run the review and how you can give us your views.
Background to the review
We are undertaking the review because there is growing public concern and mounting scientific evidence about the environmental impacts of the most intensive form of shooting especially driven grouse moor management (which involves shooting our native red grouse) and largescale release of non-native game birds, primarily pheasants and red-legged partridges, now in excess of 57 million birds annually.
Impacts include the ongoing and systematic illegal persecution of birds of prey such as hen harriers; the ecological impact of high numbers of game birds released into the countryside which may increase the density of generalist predators; the mass culling of mountain hares in some parts of our uplands; the use of lead ammunition; the impact of burning peatlands and medicating wild animals for shooting.
Review process
There are three stages to our review.
In this first phase we are seeking the views of members and those with an interest in gamebird shooting. This will help us develop nature conservation principles for gamebird shooting and associated land management to be approved by our Council this summer.
The second phase involves completing scientific reviews of the evidence of impacts from the two most intensive forms of shooting (driven grouse and gamebird releases) to help assess these shooting styles against the conservation principles.
The final phase involves reviewing the RSPB’s existing policy on driven grouse shooting and developing a new position on gamebird releases.
We plan to announce the results of this review of our policy at the AGM in October.
How views can be shared
We are particularly keen to hear the views of members to assess the strength of feeling on this often-emotive subject.
This is why we are asking a sample of members to take part in a survey to gauge views and opinions around aspects of gamebird shooting and associated land management. This is done in a randomised way in order to get a broad spectrum of views. If you are one of those members then you will be receiving an email in the coming week with details about how to take part.
We also want to give all members a chance to express their views, should they wish to do so, through a more general consultation. If you are a member you can give your views on the environmental impacts of gamebird shooting and possible solutions by visiting this webpage here.
During this period, RSPB staff and volunteers will be invited to give their views.
And finally, we are today inviting organisations with an interest in nature conservation, animal welfare, land management and gamebird shootings to submit their views through a separate but complementary consultation. If you are interested in taking part in the stakeholder consultation please contact gamebirdreview@rspb.org.uk.
We’re committed to conducting a rigorous review and so your views will be much appreciated.
While it may take some time before the process is complete, we shall of course communicate the results once the RSPB Council has reached a decision regarding our new policy.
One final point, while the review is being conducted, our current position remains the same - we will continue to call for the introduction of licencing of driven grouse shooting (a topic which remains particularly live in Scotland following the independent review of grouse moor management).
I look forward to hearing from you.
----------------------------------
Photo credit: Louise Greenhorn's image of red grouse in heather (rspb-images.com)
Shooting in this manner is an outdated, uncompassionate, cruel and pointless sport. Why do we see it as so necessary to continue outdated traditions - not all traditions are worth keeping. It's time we moved on. Killing wildlife for sport, killing wildlife to aid that sport and damaging the environment in ANY way is no longer acceptable. These privileged few who feel that they are above such matters and think they can please themselves and do whatever they wish, need to learn that they cannot. We should apply as much pressure as possible to get them to change their ways.
The release of so many non native birds into the countryside every year is extremely damaging to our ecosystem and the killing of these birds for fun is totally abhorant. The RSPB should, at the very least, make a stand against the killing of birds for sport, the continued killing of so many of our birds of prey, and the destruction of our moorlands by driven grouse shooting which is certainly exacerbating our current flooding problems. The clue is in your title Royal Society for the PROTECTION of Birds. I believe if something isn't done soon you may start losing members. Something which I have seriously considered after being a member for 40+ years.
This comment says itr all for me well and succinctly - I quote Mike ''It is time for the RSPB to get off the fence on this issue once and for all. It is not just about raptor persecution but the degradation of potentially rich habitat for something that should be resigned to the past. In the current circumstances let’s not forget about flooding, which the burning of moorland exacerbates. Get off the fence and call for a ban!''
I am against any form of so called sport that involves the killing or maiming of animals. Shoot clays instead.
Gamebird shooting is cruel, driven grouse shooting trashes the environment and is the cause of massive persecution of other species especially birds of prey. In addition it is completely unacceptable that the release of huge numbers of non-native species isn't regulated.