I am not sure that it was particularly wise for the Countryside Alliance to attempt to stir up negative PR against the RSPB regarding our latest issue of Birdcrime.
Why? Because...
...it allows us to confirm the professional way in which our team works with the police and the public to detect and document incidents of illegal activity and
...if the complaint gets the oxygen of publicity then once again people will read or hear about illegal killing of birds of prey by those linked to the shooting community.
For the record, this is what we have been saying in response to the criticism...
It is disappointing that Countryside Alliance has chosen to dispute the figures presented within the Birdcrime report. Surely it would be smarter to welcome the report and then challenge the shooting community to root out those within it who commit criminal offences against protected birds of prey.
As stated in the Birdcrime report, the data provide an annual snapshot of reported crimes and convictions but cannot ever be a definitive record of the totality of illegal bird of prey killing. In the same way, the number of convictions for speeding does not represent the total number of people that speed while driving. What Birdcrime does prove is that the illegal killing of birds of prey is still a widespread practice and is continuing long after these birds received legal protection. We make it very clear in Birdcrime that, because of the small sample size and the fact that offences are often committed in some of the wildest areas of Britain, detection rates will always be low and are really the tip of a much larger iceberg.A much more complete picture of the impact of these crimes is assessed through rigorous scientific studies, such as a 2012 paper on peregrine nesting success in northern England. This and other documents, such as the Government’s own framework reports on hen harrier and golden eagle, underline the role that grouse moors play in reducing the numbers of birds of prey in some of our most iconic landscapes.The statistics presented in Birdcrime represent reported or confirmed cases of persecution against birds of prey. The strongest motive for killing birds of prey come from those with interests in game management. Sometimes even we are staggered at the extent of the killing. In 2007 the RSPB was contacted by two gamekeepers about the activities of another keeper on a shooting estate in Shropshire. Following an investigation, a vermin book was recovered detailing the killing of over 100 buzzards within one six-month period: many more than the number of buzzards that were formally confirmed as illegally killed for the whole UK in 2007 in the Birdcrime report. The head keeper and assistant keeper were subsequently convicted for offences under the Wildlife & Countryside Act.It is time the Countryside Alliance moved from denial to leadership. Law-abiding shooting estates and gamekeepers have nothing to fear from the RSPB, but we will not shy away from highlighting the bad practices associated with shooting when we have the evidence to do so.As Martin Harper clearly states in his foreword to this year’s Birdcrime report: “We look forward to uniting with the organisations which are opposed to illegal persecution, and bringing forward the changes needed to ensure legitimate businesses are free from association with this dark shadow that hangs over the shooting community. Together we can finally consign bird of prey persecution to the history books."
Having read both the Birdcrime report and the Countryside Alliance comments I have no doubt that the Man on the Clapham Omnibus (who in this case would certainly be a disinterested party)would have no problem in deciding on the accuracy and validity of the two publications!
The RSPB could easily use the same tactic of demolishing the CA's arguments point by point as it did in the Hen Harrier Action Plan but I can see no merit in wasting the RSPB's valuable time and resources in responding to such ill-informed nonsense.
Richard.
As I've said before, the ball is firmly in shooting's court and it is a great shame - especially for law abiding shooting people - that the leadership of 'country sports' seems to be going firmly for confrontation rather than putting their house in order. The scary thing about the crime stats is that they can only be the tip of the iceberg - the likelihood of detection is weighed so heavily against RSPB that it is surprising so many crimes are prosecuted - but maybe that reflects the arrogance of people who simply can't believe they are going to get caught. The biggest problem for you, Martin, is not the abuse - its that whether RSPB likes it or not it is getting pushed relentlessly towards having to take a harder position. It might not be what you want, or the best for the countryside and nature - stopping the killing would be best - but the ball is in shooting's court and they are taking the decisions, however foolish they may be.
You are quite right Martin. There is a saying I belive which says " it has to be exceedinly bad publicity to be bad publicity". In other words the total misrepresentation that the RSPB has been receiving at the hands of parts of the shooting interests and in some parts of the media, may only serve in the long run to increase the publicity as far as the general public are concerned, of the bird crimes that are being committed and the sterling efforts the RSPB is making to combat them. This can only help to right these wrongs being inflicted on nature.
I received my copy of the just published "Birdcrime 2013" on Friday. It is a very good and well produced document indeed. It is just a shame it has to contain so much sad information and so many sad pictures. The section in the document which is very important (although it is all important) is the section headed "A Manifesto for Change" with a subtitle "Assessment of Progress". It shows the overwhelming case for the need for vastly improved legislation to protect nature and wild birds especially birds of prey. It also shows the painfuly slow progress or lack of any progress by the Government in responding to the reports from The House of Commons Environmental Audit Committee on wildlife crime and the Law Commissions interim findings in its review of wildlife laws.
One can quite see from all this why a bill for Nature in the next Parliament is so important and therefore why "Vote for Bob" is so important.
I think it would be worth showing or giving a copy of the RSPBs "Birdcrime 2013" to MPs at the Parliamentary Rally on the 9th December and/or talking them through it. Its quality shines through and by way of this, completely dismisses the erroneous arguements and misrepresentations arising from the parts of the media and the shooting industry.