White-tailed eagles - again!

Yesterday morning I did an interview (just before 9 o'clock)  on the proposed white-tailed eagle reintroduction to Suffolk.  It wasn’t my best interview ever, I thought, but I managed to get a few points across.

There’s no doubt that some of the opposition to the proposed white-tailed eagle reintroduction is orchestrated by those who dislike all raptors.  And I fear that some of it is orchestrated by those who dislike the RSPB and/or Natural England. 

Here are some white-tailed eagle myths:

Myth 1: white-tailed eagles were never present in lowland England or were only present in small numbers thousands of years ago.  Neither is true.  The eminent academic Derek Yalden looked at the evidence (archeological, place names and written accounts) of sea eagles living in lowland England and concluded ‘In combination, there is no doubt that White-tailed Eagles frequented lowland, southern Britain through Roman and Anglo-Saxon times.  Historically, there is no reason to question the propriety of attempting to reintroduce the species to southern England.’.  And we believe that the last English breeding record was on the Isle of Wight in the 1780s.

Myth 2: although white-tailed eagles were present, East Anglia is so different now, with so many more people, that the eagles would not be able to cope these days. I am convinced that this is a myth because white-tailed eagles already live, further east on continental Europe, in many areas with much higher human population densities.  I’m grateful to a Facebook friend for pointing out that these birds can be seen on the outskirts of Hamburg.  And the closely related American bald eagle is a common sight above New England towns and cities. 

Myth 3: East Anglia is the wrong type of habitat completely – these birds belong in places like Mull and Norway.  Although Norway has a large white-tailed eagle population (about a third of the European total) much of the geographic range of the species is in low-lying flat areas with good fish and wetland bird populations.  In Poland, Germany, Romania and Denmark (and elsewhere too) white-tailed eagles are at home in low-lying areas – and in historic times they would have been even more widespread and common.  It's a bit like the red kite - they were, in the UK, restricted to upland Wales after persecution wiped them out in the lowlands but a look across the Channel to Europe showed that they also thrive in lowland areas.

Myth 4: white-tailed eagles would cause problems for other wildlife.  Natural England and the RSPB have considered this!  Where is the evidence that elsewhere in the current range any such problems occur?  Experts elsewhere in Europe are very reassuring on this count.  And is there evidence that the closely-related bald eagle causes wildlife problems?  Please let me know.

Myth 5: white-tailed eagles would cause problems for livestock.  I can imagine that the odd chicken, goose or piglet might be taken but I don't know of such cases.  Is there evidence that such problems occur elsewhere in the range of the species?  I’d be genuinely keen to hear more about this.  But without evidence let's class this as a myth for now.  And I’d like to know how any such losses would compare with the extra tourist income that would accrue to local businesses through eco-tourism? 

There are probably more myths – point them out to me and I’ll keep de-mything on this subject!  Or tell me where the analysis is wrong, with any evidence that exists, and I’ll be happy to correct it.

But there are also some concerns that I feel are much closer to judgement calls:

Judgement call 1: this is a very expensive project. Well it is true that I couldn’t afford to fund it out of my own pocket.  Let’s say that it might cost a total of £500,000 over a five year period (roughly – it could be more or less in my opinion).  This is a lot of money, but there are plenty of people out there who have homes worth around that amount (not me!).  If that were the cost of re-establishing white-tailed eagles in lowland England after an absence of a few centuries then some would call it cheap. And compared with the cost of buying or managing nature reserves (both of which are great things to do of course!), giving advice to farmers, doing research on seabird movements and a whole long list of other projects, then it isn’t remotely in the top league of charitable expenditure.  In any case, there may be donors prepared to cover the project’s costs if it goes ahead.

Judgement call 2:  white-tailed eagles will get to East Anglia under their own steam, why meddle? It is true that the European population is currently expanding slowly, and there is one (I think still one) pair nesting in the Netherlands now.  So, yes, the white-tailed eagle probably will get here and start breeding under its own steam eventually – maybe from Scotland.  But when?  I can't see it happening in my lifetime even though I hope to have a much longer innings than my present 51 years.  Why not give them a helping hand?  We intervene in many ways in nature conservation – habitat restoration is intervention, agri-environment schemes are intervention, tackling pollution is intervention, reintroduction is intervention too!  We could always wait and hope, but giving a helping hand seems to me to be what nature conservationists should do.

Let’s keep talking about this project, whose demise has been incorrectly reported today (more misinformation!), but let those discussions be of the tenor of those on my previous blog on this subject (29 December) which are well worth reading again.

I’d have to say that unless there is some real evidence why we should fear the impacts of white-tailed eagles on livestock and/or wildlife then it still looks to me, on balance, like a great and positive conservation initiative.  But I’m open to other views – on any basis, but particularly backed up with facts.