I enjoy writing this blog, and it's clear that an ever-growing number of people are reading it.  We can't be sure quite how many!

You can follow this blog in a number of ways - here!, through Twitter (where you can find me as markavery, c1300 followers), Facebook (Mark Ian Avery, over 1000 friends) and through Networked Blogs (just passed 400 followers).

A current government Minister said in public that he or she followed this blog, and Defra has just started following it through Twitter!

We know that former Ministers followed this blog when they were in power and some, at least, continue to follow it now. 

Quite some time ago I got a phone call from one government department asking whether I could help them with a disagreement they were having with another government department.  After expressing surprise that we might be able to help I agreed as what was suggested might well help the RSPB's advocacy objectives.  I agreed that the first department could put the second department in touch with us, and in passing, said that I would probably be blogging on the subject anyway.  A couple of days passed and the expected phone call didn't materialise and so I asked whether we might expect a call.  The reply came back that a Minister in the second department had read my blog on the subject and that had allowed the disagreement to be fixed. 

The Guardian listed my Twitter account - one way to follow this blog - as one of the top 50 on wildlife conservation, with the kind words that it's written by a wildlife guru and that it definitely isn't just for bird people.

We know that journalists read the blog regularly and in their recent big piece on government cuts the Guardian referred to this blog - and had a rather random photograph of me marring the otherwise excellent images of beautiful nature!

At the Bird Fair, someone told me that although he hated to say it (!) this blog had become a 'must read' part of the scene and was becoming even more important at this time of government cuts.

Some more recent feedback came through the blog when someone whom I wouldn't regard as always being in agreement with the RSPB, praised this blog for its ability to change the public's views through dialogue and debate - that seems rather too much praise, but it was a nice thing to say!

I'd be interested in your feedback, positive or negative, on this blog.  My aim is to discuss subjects that are interesting and important in nature conservation. Over the last year and a bit I have often written on farming (funding, our work with farmers, wildlife and what farming organisations are doing and saying, Hope Farm, set-aside), climate change (is it real?, are we doing enough?), birds of prey (how fantastic they are, illegal killing of them, their lack of impacts on prey numbers), reintroductions (corncrakes, sea eagles and bumblebees), badgers (and the whole bTB issue), the marine environment (marine Acts, marine protected areas, studying seabirds at sea), government cuts (!), RSPB campaigns (Letter to the Future, birds of prey, spending cuts), events I attend (Bird Fair, party conferences, Futurescapes launch, Game Fair) et cetera et cetera.  I also write about what I feel about nature - I love it!

That's quite a long list and it doesn't cover everything by any means!  But I feel a little guilty that there are lots of areas of RSPB work that haven't had so much coverage - our nature reserves get mentions but should get more, the planning system and our water policy work, our research, our international work - there is so much more!  I'll try to do better in future - but you tell me what you think!

And this blog aims to be open and to tell you what the RSPB is doing and what is happening.  There are plenty of things I've heard or seen that would have been fun to write about, fun for you to read, but would be inappropriate or would be breaking confidences so you won't hear about those things!  But nor am I aiming to keep everyone happy in what I write!  We know that politicians and civil servants are extremely sensitive to criticism, implied criticism or even a vague hint that there might be something to criticise - well this blog is part of the RSPB's work as being a voice for nature, and nature too often gets a poor deal, and this blog will continue to say so. 

Often, hearing that this blog has touched a raw nerve somewhere is all the encouragement that is needed to keep going!  Quite some time ago I was approached while with other RSPB staff by someone (no clues!) who, admittedly with a big smile on his or her face, called me a 'blogging b***ard' - and I would stress that this was done with a very big grin!  Nice to know that she or he was keeping up to date with the blog!

And I am asked whether I actually write this blog - or is there a team of writers involved?!  No, just me, I'm afraid!  There have been a very small number of blogs where I have basically recycled RSPB press releases with a bit of comment and a very very small number where a colleague has written some paragraphs on subjects that I really am not well up on but are important - but 99.5% of these words are written by me - so blame me for everything!

Apologies for this rather self indulgent post!  If you want this blog to be different then let me know and I'll think about it!  If you like it, and it seems that quite a lot of people do! then, first - thank you! and second - please spread the word and get some other people reading it too.

A love of the natural world demonstrates that a person is a cultured inhabitant of planet Earth.

  • I must say that – as a non-member of the RSPB – with a strong interest (infatuation?) with Mother Nature - Mark has been both patient and fair to me and my passionately held (scientific) views.

    I am pleased to hear that the latest technology is spreading the word and people in important / influential positions are ‘listening’.

    The blog offers the RSPB Conservation Director an informal medium through which he can communicate on a day-to-day basis with both its members and those (such as DEFRA ministers) of a political bent!  

    Integrating a ‘blog’ with a full-time day job is not easy and is very demanding.

    I believe Mark has struck the right balance and his commitment / dedication was very well illustrated when he recently visited Exmoor – the transition was seamless and in reality it went ‘unnoticed’ – I expected the blog to ‘freeze’ for a week or two.

  • It'a a brilliant blogg Mark. It strikes all the right notes as far as I am concerned. It is ecellent for keeping one right up to date on wildlife issues and while it obviously relates to the RSPB, it is excellent to have  proper considered views on topical conservation issues. So much of the printed and spoke word these days is either deliberately biased, hyped up and over dramatised or just plain wrong. The RSPB's policy of applying sound science to their work, and which comes over in your blogg, is crucial, long may it last. It is an example that much of the media and some politicians should follow. Keep on blogging.

    redkite

  • All - thanks for the comments!  

    Sweep - welcome! and best wishes to Sooty!

    A love of the natural world demonstrates that a person is a cultured inhabitant of planet Earth.

  • Hi mark

    There is nothing wrong with a bit of self indulgence at times

    The RSPB is an interesting and informative forum, and reading peoples blog's adds to the flavour of wildlife issues.

    Blogging is a good tool and to many it is just the best thing to have to pass on information of all types to the wider audience.

    Just keeps us all up to date with important close to our hearts

    Kathyx

  • Mark, I'm not really into blogging, twitter and all the other computer thingies.  I read very few blogs but I can say that I find both the comments you make and the discussions you get going to be informative and slightly addictive.  It is nice to see the right messages being aired and long may you keep going