This is a lovely time of year and I love it when nature chooses to come to my garden.  It feels like a vote of confidence that I've been doing some of the right things when a bird or insect shows up on my land.

Previous blogs (here and here) have said a little about what to do in the garden but I really am not an expert so I don't have that much to say.

But I can see that I may have more opportunity to learn over the next few months and years and that's one of the things I intend to do.

And this is one of the areas where the Big Society idea really works - if we all made our gardens just a little bit better for nature then the impact could be very significant - at least up to a point.  Providing food and nest sites for birds, planting the right type of plants for insects, not using pesticides (or at least being very careful about their use), favouring native plant species, leaving some areas of grass uncut and maybe even providing a water feature of some sort - all these things feel like good things to do (and would be good things for farmers to do on a larger scale too). 

But, please note, it isn't the full Big Society idea because it doesn't involve Small Government as well.  The government doesn't have much to say about my garden and that's how it should be.  Unlike the farmland around us I do not receive payments from the taxpayer and cannot receive payments for wildlife-friendly gardening.  And there is no reduction in government spending on my garden.  So the Big Society bit applies to my garden but the Small Government bit does not.

Nature has encouraged me in several ways over the last week to do more for it in the garden.  First there was the singing great tit I heard from the bath with an unusual song type.  Rather than the usual 'tee-cher, tee-cher, tee-cher' which actually does come in a wide variety of song types such as 'zee-tee, zee-tee, zee-tee', 'zee-cher, zee-cher, zee-cher', 'cher-tee. zer-chee, zer-chee' and the occasional chiffchaff mimicer, this great tit had a song of 'schwee, too-tee, too-tee, too'.  I haven't heard it for the last couple of days but I'll be listening out for it.

And then there was the coal tit singing from a tree next door which flew across our garden to our other neighbour's garden before returning, again without setting foot in our place.  Coal tit is an unusual bird for our garden - occasional but unusual on the feeders.

And holly blues are flitting around the ivy, an orange tip has been reported (but I haven't seen one) and, earlier, male brimstones demonstrated why their ilk are called butterflies - so yellow they make early spring bright.

So, many of us can make a contribution to wildlife at home.  We won't save the bittern, the skylark or the blue whale by doing so but we will be making a difference and knowing that we have done our bit.

 

Parents
  • Hi Mark I agree entirely with what you say but perhaps by emphasising how good the RSPB was in helping to keep the agri-environment payments you almost make it sound as if farmers are lucky to get the payments whereas they hardly cover the cost of getting the payment but do mostly help wildlife a great deal so everyone gains,or perhaps I should say a very small number of people perhaps 5% of population benefit but all wildlife.

    Keeping it in perspective on back page of today's Telegraph,one in four farmers living below poverty line.I promise you they would find it difficult to do wildlife friendly things if it meant less profit and so their family's suffer.Of course we have people on the forum who choose to ignore the ordinary farmers income and quote the income from the large farm businesses but if they got better informed or had a go at farming would find how hard it is to become as they put it a RICH FARMER.

Comment
  • Hi Mark I agree entirely with what you say but perhaps by emphasising how good the RSPB was in helping to keep the agri-environment payments you almost make it sound as if farmers are lucky to get the payments whereas they hardly cover the cost of getting the payment but do mostly help wildlife a great deal so everyone gains,or perhaps I should say a very small number of people perhaps 5% of population benefit but all wildlife.

    Keeping it in perspective on back page of today's Telegraph,one in four farmers living below poverty line.I promise you they would find it difficult to do wildlife friendly things if it meant less profit and so their family's suffer.Of course we have people on the forum who choose to ignore the ordinary farmers income and quote the income from the large farm businesses but if they got better informed or had a go at farming would find how hard it is to become as they put it a RICH FARMER.

Children
No Data