I live on an island in the Outer Hebrides (think remote and rural and challenging weather). There were just a few house sparrows, or so it seemed, around here 15 years ago. Over that 15 years I have increased habitat including bushes, small trees, 'scruffy' areas and borders, ponds and bird baths, put up nest boxes and bird feeders (wild bird seed all year round, added fat balls in the winter and just recently nyjer seeds for the goldfinches and redpolls that have suddenly appeared). House sparrow numbers have increased dramatically: I now feed a flock of well over 100 all year round. In fact, in winter they seek me out, clamouring for me to refill the feeders. I adore all birds and house sparrows in particular, so naturally oblige.
As well as the increase in house sparrows there has been an increase in the number and variety of other birds, including predators like sparrowhawks. Although this could be down to habitat creation too, the sheer 'unnatural' number of house sparrows is worrying me a bit. Have I altered the natural balance too much? I feel I've created an unnatural oasis in the middle of wild moorland/coast land. Should I wean the birds off the feeders or just carry on enjoying all these lovely birds?
Birding is for everyone no matter how good or bad we are at it,enjoy it while you can
As the others have said, though I will add, it is very likely that there will a variety of mitigating reasons, and food supply will be one of them, along with the prevailing weather and surrounding environment, and I don't mean immediately around you, it could be from miles away.
If you do contact anyone regarding this, it would be interesting if you would share their response.
Flickr Peak Rambler
In reply to Robbo:
In reply to allthegearnoidea:
allthegearnoidea said:Thanks everyone - I suspect I'm feeding them all the time because of the pleasure I get from seeing them. Whether it actually does any good in the long term [for them] is questionable.
I'm definitely guilty of feeding wildlife for the pleasure of seeing them.
However, for centauries, man has interfered/altered nature and what I'm seeing is more and more squeezing is being put on nature and the countryside to satisfy our demand for houses, roads, airports and other commercial aspects.
I'm now retired, thankfully, but one thing that was often used to encourage the workforce to become more productive, was the terminology "work smarter"!
Basically it was a way of telling the workforce to find ways to make themselves become more productive using what they already have, and I fear a similar application is being forced on the countryside and nature (I'm using nature rather than wildlife so to include plants, trees etc).
Whilst the open countryside is being reclaimed for buildings, hoses, roads, etc, we're putting the pressure on wildlife removing their food and habitats, and thus indirectly putting the squeeze on people to feed these creatures.
Not in my lifetime, r the next few generations, unless there is a stop to the incessant building programs we have, then those with gardens and many will be postage stamp gardens because of the demand for space to build, then wildlife feeding stations may be the only food source they have.
Or perhaps I'm being melodramatic....
We spend 90% of net income on conservation, public education and advocacy
The RSPB is a member of BirdLife International. Find out more about the partnership
© The Royal Society for the Protection of Birds (RSPB) is a registered charity: England and Wales no. 207076, Scotland no. SC037654
Accepting all non-essential cookies helps us to personalise your experience
These cookies are required for basic web functions
Allow us to collect anonymised performance data
Allow us to personalise your experience