Old thread here: http://www.rspb.org.uk/community/chat/f/2542/t/22684.aspx
Because the original thread has, fittingly enough, 'gone bad', it's time for a new 'Bad pics' thread. Here, we celebrate the very worst of our wildlife photography. The subject matter is always brilliant, but the photos are very much not. If it's out of focus, chopped in half, frighteningly under- or over-exposed or terrible in some other way, it belongs here :)
Here's my first (first of many, no doubt) contribution to the new thread, a Goldcrest taken at Barnes yesterday. You need only minor incompetence to take a blurry photo, and the same to take a really under-exposed photo, but to do both in one go requires a special level of cackhandedness.
My blog: http://mazzaswildside.blogspot.co.uk/
My Flickr page: https://www.flickr.com/photos/124028194@N04/
(Pardon the Scottish Accent)
Kind regards, Ann
Unknown said:Lol, Mike!--To quote you, "One day, I may grow up". Going by your performance to date, seems a bit unlikely!
I'd say very unlikely. LOL
Mike
Flickr: Peak Rambler
Linda257 said:
Yee hah......
As my post of Bad pics of a Fab Kingfisher proved popular I remembered a sequence of shots of a female Kingfisher throwing up. I was watching her sitting in a tree when she started looking like a cat bringing up a fur ball, after a while she produced a pellet and looked a lot happier and got back to fishing.
Trevor
You just posted those in reverse sequence order Trevor....she caught a flying fish
What a fabulous sequence of photos Trevor.
After a recent spate of pretty good Goldcrest pictures that begged the question "are they becoming easier to photograph?" I think yesterday I answered it, categorically "No!"