Old thread here: http://www.rspb.org.uk/community/chat/f/2542/t/22684.aspx
Because the original thread has, fittingly enough, 'gone bad', it's time for a new 'Bad pics' thread. Here, we celebrate the very worst of our wildlife photography. The subject matter is always brilliant, but the photos are very much not. If it's out of focus, chopped in half, frighteningly under- or over-exposed or terrible in some other way, it belongs here :)
Here's my first (first of many, no doubt) contribution to the new thread, a Goldcrest taken at Barnes yesterday. You need only minor incompetence to take a blurry photo, and the same to take a really under-exposed photo, but to do both in one go requires a special level of cackhandedness.
My blog: http://mazzaswildside.blogspot.co.uk/
My Flickr page: https://www.flickr.com/photos/124028194@N04/
A male GWS in hiding!
Look for the red patch above the feeder!
Mike
Flickr: Peak Rambler
I'll see your secret great wotted spudpecker and raise you a spotted redshank's bum ...
Internetman said:
Or even a red spank bum.....
I'll crawl back into my hole, this retirement malarkey isn't doing me any good! LOL
(Pardon the Scottish Accent)
Answers on a postcard.!!
My bird photos HERE
A blackbird darting around....
Over the last three years I've had quite a bit of luck with KIngfishers, but I'm still waiting to nail one of the emergence from the water (with fish hopefully). There have been many near misses, some quite close, and even that is difficult. At least there are plenty of excuses to go back and try again.
Trevor
Do these pictures qualify as Bad Pics of Fab Wildlife.
800
TJS said:Do these pictures qualify as Bad Pics of Fab Wildlife
Certainly qualify as humorous timing!!
__________
Nige Flickr
LOL, I'll keep my answer publishable, though I'm sure you will have similar if not the same words that came to my naughty mind! One day, I may grow up and be a bit more
As Nigel says, nice timing.....