Old thread here: http://www.rspb.org.uk/community/chat/f/2542/t/22684.aspx
Because the original thread has, fittingly enough, 'gone bad', it's time for a new 'Bad pics' thread. Here, we celebrate the very worst of our wildlife photography. The subject matter is always brilliant, but the photos are very much not. If it's out of focus, chopped in half, frighteningly under- or over-exposed or terrible in some other way, it belongs here :)
Here's my first (first of many, no doubt) contribution to the new thread, a Goldcrest taken at Barnes yesterday. You need only minor incompetence to take a blurry photo, and the same to take a really under-exposed photo, but to do both in one go requires a special level of cackhandedness.
My blog: http://mazzaswildside.blogspot.co.uk/
My Flickr page: https://www.flickr.com/photos/124028194@N04/
Are birds obligatory for "Bad pics of fab wildlife"Title - "Voyeurs"Or "Just watchin'"Or "Twitchin'"
I blame covid as am no usually this bad...am I lol
(Pardon the Scottish Accent)
Who can find the Great Grey Shrike? Though I never was so close to one ( 1,5m), it's one of my poorest captures. Well, twigs and birdiing with mobile is a difficult mix.
What the other half of my pictures from today looked like!
Regards
Benji
One (of many) from Arne today
I have been having a similar problem today. Guess who: