Old thread here: http://www.rspb.org.uk/community/chat/f/2542/t/22684.aspx
Because the original thread has, fittingly enough, 'gone bad', it's time for a new 'Bad pics' thread. Here, we celebrate the very worst of our wildlife photography. The subject matter is always brilliant, but the photos are very much not. If it's out of focus, chopped in half, frighteningly under- or over-exposed or terrible in some other way, it belongs here :)
Here's my first (first of many, no doubt) contribution to the new thread, a Goldcrest taken at Barnes yesterday. You need only minor incompetence to take a blurry photo, and the same to take a really under-exposed photo, but to do both in one go requires a special level of cackhandedness.
My blog: http://mazzaswildside.blogspot.co.uk/
My Flickr page: https://www.flickr.com/photos/124028194@N04/
The inevitable branch
You're going to have to work extra hard to work out which bird is in this pic !!
_____________________________________
Regards, Hazel
Regards
Benji
BenjiS said:Is that a little blue tail in the bottom left corner?
Well spotted Benji, yes, your sharp eyes spotted a Kingfisher heading stage left or stage right from the KF's view !!
By 'eck Benji, I'll bet you're good at jigsaws!
(Pardon the Scottish Accent)
Great species but most either too far away or not stopping long for a photo. !!
Otter a zillion miles away ............
A Kingfisher that only perched for a few seconds ............ bum shot. lol
and two very distant Marsh Harriers too far away in field for any sort of photo really .......
You do get one miserable photo which still needs to be posted on here which was the KF as soon as it landed for 10 seconds. lol
Anyone up for a quick game of 'spot the bird'. - I actually failed to get a single decent photo of the 4 or 5 that were busy in one of the oak trees
Proud to be maintaining the standard of photography
Cin J