Old thread here: http://www.rspb.org.uk/community/chat/f/2542/t/22684.aspx
Because the original thread has, fittingly enough, 'gone bad', it's time for a new 'Bad pics' thread. Here, we celebrate the very worst of our wildlife photography. The subject matter is always brilliant, but the photos are very much not. If it's out of focus, chopped in half, frighteningly under- or over-exposed or terrible in some other way, it belongs here :)
Here's my first (first of many, no doubt) contribution to the new thread, a Goldcrest taken at Barnes yesterday. You need only minor incompetence to take a blurry photo, and the same to take a really under-exposed photo, but to do both in one go requires a special level of cackhandedness.
that's not a bad shot Jim ! especially as its the fidgety goldcrest.
I'm quite shocked to hear Hering Gull is found on the Red List already! Not good at all. Real sad indeed.
I'd be more than happy about this Dunnock capture, Alan. In my patch, I just can't find any. It's driving me slowly crazy ...
A rather vocal herring gull at Felixstowe Ferry today:
Inevitably the red-head smew scarpered the minute I realised what I was looking at:
The immature glaucous gull at Minsmere yesterday would absolutely not flaunt its pale beauty:
We spend 90% of net income on conservation, public education and advocacy
The RSPB is a member of BirdLife International. Find out more about the partnership
© The Royal Society for the Protection of Birds (RSPB) is a registered charity: England and Wales no. 207076, Scotland no. SC037654